1994
DOI: 10.1159/000462545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proficiency Testing of Factor VIII:C Activitiy Assays at the Canadian Red Cross Society National Reference Laboratory

Abstract: A national proficiency testing program has been established to monitor the accuracy and precision of factor VIII:C (FVIII:C) assays performed at the various Blood Services Centres of the Canadian Red Cross Society involved in the collection and processing of either donor blood designated for component production or plasma destined for fractionation. This paper describes the preparation, design, and results of the first four exercises involving 19 laboratories. The exercices were designed to allow the investiga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, except for the stipulation of using HEp-2 cells as substrate, there were no constraints on the use of other reagents or on methodology, since it is known that different laboratories use materials and reagents from many different manufacturers. The analysis of intra-and interlaboratory variability provided estimates of CVs that are comparable to values obtained in other multicenter studies of this nature (15)(16)(17)(18). Nevertheless, the intraand inter-laboratory comparisons showed a substantial variation in ANA assay results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Therefore, except for the stipulation of using HEp-2 cells as substrate, there were no constraints on the use of other reagents or on methodology, since it is known that different laboratories use materials and reagents from many different manufacturers. The analysis of intra-and interlaboratory variability provided estimates of CVs that are comparable to values obtained in other multicenter studies of this nature (15)(16)(17)(18). Nevertheless, the intraand inter-laboratory comparisons showed a substantial variation in ANA assay results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%