2021
DOI: 10.1080/19463014.2020.1798259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proffering absurd candidate formulations in the pursuit of progressivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line 7, Kim pursues an answer from Nao by proffering a candidate response (“Is it a heart sickness?”). On the surface this aligns with the potentially serious way in which Nao's pre‐request was formulated, but through laminated embodiment, Kim actually formulates this as an absurd candidate formulation (Amar, Nanbu, & Greer, 2021), by leaning back as she produces an exaggerated heart‐shaped gesture and elongating the vowel on “heart.” Therefore, Kim's joke‐first points to the missing modifier in Nao's request and affords him an opportunity to repair the utterance himself. Nao's next‐turn response in line 8 correctly treats Kim's candidate as designed to be rejected and replaced with a more fitting response (Amar, Nanbu, & Greer, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In line 7, Kim pursues an answer from Nao by proffering a candidate response (“Is it a heart sickness?”). On the surface this aligns with the potentially serious way in which Nao's pre‐request was formulated, but through laminated embodiment, Kim actually formulates this as an absurd candidate formulation (Amar, Nanbu, & Greer, 2021), by leaning back as she produces an exaggerated heart‐shaped gesture and elongating the vowel on “heart.” Therefore, Kim's joke‐first points to the missing modifier in Nao's request and affords him an opportunity to repair the utterance himself. Nao's next‐turn response in line 8 correctly treats Kim's candidate as designed to be rejected and replaced with a more fitting response (Amar, Nanbu, & Greer, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…On the surface this aligns with the potentially serious way in which Nao's pre‐request was formulated, but through laminated embodiment, Kim actually formulates this as an absurd candidate formulation (Amar, Nanbu, & Greer, 2021), by leaning back as she produces an exaggerated heart‐shaped gesture and elongating the vowel on “heart.” Therefore, Kim's joke‐first points to the missing modifier in Nao's request and affords him an opportunity to repair the utterance himself. Nao's next‐turn response in line 8 correctly treats Kim's candidate as designed to be rejected and replaced with a more fitting response (Amar, Nanbu, & Greer, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation