“…However, the many African American, African, Afro-diasporic, and non-Black scholars who have carried on this task in the twenty-first century tend to accept an African presence in the Bible and to generate scholarship beyond Copher's method of uncovering the Black presence. Newer methods include analyzing how Africans are depicted in religious texts (Byron 2002); paying attention to issues of gender, class, and sexuality in biblical texts as well as the contexts of writers and readers (Bailey 2009(Bailey , 2010Byron and Lovelace 2016;Gafney 2017); interrogating the liberatory potential of biblical texts for marginalized people (Bennett 2003;Masenya 2005;Weems 2003); and studying the psychological, social, cultural, and political meanings of scripture for Africana peoples (Bowens 2020;Love 2013;Junior 2020;Junior and Schipper 2020;Marbury 2015;Powery and Sadler 2016;Schipper 2017;Wimbush 2000). Thus, Copher's more narrow focus on deconstructing the Hamitic Hypothesis by demonstrating the Black presence in the Bible is no longer a central aim of Africana biblical interpretation.…”