2003
DOI: 10.1177/1359105303008002661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professionalization and Reflexivity in Critical Health Psychology Practice

Abstract: W E S U P P O RT the arguments advanced by Prilleltensky and Prilleltensky (this issue) regarding the development of a critical health psychology practice. We draw attention to the key issues their article raises for debate about the professionalization of health psychology, and argue that a critical approach to practice counters current drives towards professionalization and the unproblematic adoption of a scientist-practitoner model within health psychology. We maintain that reflexivity must occupy a central… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reflection is described as an important component of professionals' education and training (10). In a professional context, reflexivity is seen as challenging the practices, roles, beliefs and values of practitioners and promoting learning and re-development of practice (11). When reflexivity is deliberately structured, learning processes are made more explicit (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflection is described as an important component of professionals' education and training (10). In a professional context, reflexivity is seen as challenging the practices, roles, beliefs and values of practitioners and promoting learning and re-development of practice (11). When reflexivity is deliberately structured, learning processes are made more explicit (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, authors interested in reflexivity have often opposed various ideal-types of this concept, each emphasizing a specific function of the activity. Often, these types of reflexivity are opposed in the way they question the experiences and practices of research: one type may "improve best practice within currently accepted boundaries", 14 whereas the other may question and challenge the research practices of the whole system by raising the researcher's awareness and critical conscience from a broad social perspective. 7,14 This latter exercise, as a process for assessing the impact of research on social dynamics, can potentially transform the researcher into an engaged and invested social actor who is able to promote true social change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, these types of reflexivity are opposed in the way they question the experiences and practices of research: one type may "improve best practice within currently accepted boundaries", 14 whereas the other may question and challenge the research practices of the whole system by raising the researcher's awareness and critical conscience from a broad social perspective. 7,14 This latter exercise, as a process for assessing the impact of research on social dynamics, can potentially transform the researcher into an engaged and invested social actor who is able to promote true social change. 7,14,15 We believe that a sound contribution of PHIR to society can only come with this kind of reflexivity, where assumptions, power dynamics and moral issues underlying research practices are questioned.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Bolam and Chamberlain (2003) argued that positivism positions the health professional as the powerful "expert". Further, other authors have suggested that expert positioning can have implications for the patient-centered practice model that is generally accepted in physiotherapy, as in other health professions, as the preferred and most ethical way to practice Trede & Higgs, 2003;Wikstrom-Grotell & Eriksson, 2012).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives On Physiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%