2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-016-9765-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professionalization and Cost Efficiency of Fundraising in Charitable Organizations: The Case of Charitable Foundations in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main arguments in favor of the positive effects of managerialism is the opportunity it offers for more effective and efficient use of resources (von Schnurbein, 2014) by helping NPOs to improve their programs and services. By achieving more objectives with fewer resources, they enhance their financial performance (Shirinashihama, 2018) with greater cost‐efficiency (Ni, Chen, Ding, & Wu, 2017). Organizations that exhibit signs of managerialism, for instance by offering additional commercial services to subsidize their programs (Meyer & Simsa, 2014) or by investing in their organizational capacities (Faulk & Stewart, 2017), can benefit from social and financial returns on investment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main arguments in favor of the positive effects of managerialism is the opportunity it offers for more effective and efficient use of resources (von Schnurbein, 2014) by helping NPOs to improve their programs and services. By achieving more objectives with fewer resources, they enhance their financial performance (Shirinashihama, 2018) with greater cost‐efficiency (Ni, Chen, Ding, & Wu, 2017). Organizations that exhibit signs of managerialism, for instance by offering additional commercial services to subsidize their programs (Meyer & Simsa, 2014) or by investing in their organizational capacities (Faulk & Stewart, 2017), can benefit from social and financial returns on investment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2004, the State Council issued a revised regulation on philanthropic foundations that differentiated between two types of philanthropic foundations: public and private (Lai et al ). The major difference is that private foundations cannot publicly solicit voluntary donations from individual donors, firms, or overseas sources (Ni et al ). In this regard, philanthropic foundations with public fund‐raising qualifications are quite similar to public charities in the United States.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, our review identifies only a few studies on HRM and financial performance outcomes, revealing a relationship between professionalization in HRM and fundraising efficiency (Ni et al, 2017) and a positive impact of several implemented nonprofit values on financial performance success (Helmig et al, 2015). This paucity of studies diverges from a review of performance outcomes in the nonprofit literature which reveals a dominance of research on financial performance and HRM as a determinant of success (Helmig et al, 2014).…”
Section: Fragmentation In Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…);Bilgin et al (2017); W. A Brown et al (2016)Helmig et al (2014Helmig et al ( , 2015;Ni et al (2017); Parente (2012); Pedrini et al (2016); Pope et al (2015); Ridder, Piening, and Baluch (2012); Valeau (2015); Walk et al (2014) International Journal of Human Resource Management (9) Baluch (2017); Cunningham (2010, 2017); Fee and McGrath-Champ (2017); Kellner et al (2017); McDermott et al (2013); Merlot and De Cieri (2012); Rodwell and Teo (2008); Townsend et al (2017) Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (9) Ben-Ner and Ren (2015); Chang et al (2015); Eng et al (2012); Haley-Lock and Kruzich (2008); Lee (2016); Ohana et al (2013); Ridder and McCandless (2010); Schneider (2009); Visser et al (2016) Nonprofit Management and Leadership (7) K. Becker et al (2011); Froelich et al (2011); Grasse et al (2014); Mastracci and Herring (2010); von Schnurbein (2014); Swanson (2013); Treuren and Frankish (2014) Journal of Knowledge Management (3) Martin-Perez and Martin-Cruz (2015); Peet (2012); Zapata Cantu and Mondragon (2016) Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources (2) Cortis and Eastman (2015); Sheehan (2009) Employee Relations (2) Akingbola (2013b); Ohana and Meyer (2016) (continued)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%