2003
DOI: 10.1080/02642060412331300922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professionalism: evolution and measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
26
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…All of this emphasises the importance of their ongoing professional development. This then must surely position HR as a contender for the term 'new profession' (Swailes, 2003;Ardagh, 2007). Evans (2008) suggests that a more appropriate evaluation for contemporary professions is in terms of a commitment to professional development.…”
Section: Continuing Professional Development (Cpd)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of this emphasises the importance of their ongoing professional development. This then must surely position HR as a contender for the term 'new profession' (Swailes, 2003;Ardagh, 2007). Evans (2008) suggests that a more appropriate evaluation for contemporary professions is in terms of a commitment to professional development.…”
Section: Continuing Professional Development (Cpd)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Not only have the criteria become outmoded, but Swailes' (2003) view is that the current occupational climate of increased legislation, uncertainty, market pressures and shifting demands have led to the emergence of many 'new professions'.…”
Section: Continuing Professional Development (Cpd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous attempts to measure professionalism had categorised professionals on the basis of pre-defined criteria (Howell and Dorfman 1986;Mathieu and Hamel 1989), validated indicators of professionalism (Hall 1968;Hayward-Farmer and Stuart 1990;Swailes 2003) or assessed attitudes towards professionalism (Jha et al 2006;Blackall et al 2007;Tsai et al 2007) Five key elements of professionalism According to Furlong et al (2000), knowledge, autonomy and responsibility are the most widely accepted criteria of professional work. By and large, these criteria also emerged from the survey, along with two others.…”
Section: Sample and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hall's model was later modified by Snizek (1972), who retained Hall's five components but modified his instrumentation. Components of Hall's (1968) scale, as modified by Snizek (1972), have been used extensively in research on computer specialists (Bartol, 1979); physicians, nurses, and hospitals (Clark, Spurgeon, & Hamilton, 2008;Cornett, 2006;D'Aurizio & Johnson, 2006;Fetzer, 2003;Hall, 1968;O'Reilly, Parlette, & Bloom, 1980;Price & Mueller, 1981;Robertson & Wind, 1983); accountants and stockbrokers Hall, 1968;Morrow & Geotz, 1988;Shafer, Park, & Liao, 2002;Swailes, 2003);the funeral industry (Torres, 1988); scientists, engineers, and building professionals (Chan et al, 2007;Hall, 1968;Kerr et al, 1977;Snizek, 1972); management (Haga et al, 1974;Hall, 1968); medical technologists (Blau, 1999;Cornett, 2006); social workers (Hall, 1968); and teachers (Day, Stobart, Sammons, & Kington, 2006;Firestone, 1996;Hall, 1968;Nixon et al, 1997;Pearson & Hall, 1993;Pearson & Moomaw, 2006;Rinke, 2009;Tschannen-Moran, 2009).…”
Section: Professionalism Definedmentioning
confidence: 99%