Professional Role Identity: At the Heart of Medical Collaboration Across Organisational Boundaries

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper was to help answer two persistent calls in the literature: the first asks to strengthen the understanding of medical collaboration across levels of healthcare delivery; the second one requests paying more attention to the individual experience of different forms of professional work. Accordingly, the study was guided by the following research question: How do family physicians and specialists working at different levels of healthcare delivery enact their professional identity when interacting in their situated clinical contexts? Methodology: This was a multiple interpretive case study in which, based on Giddens’ ideas, professional identity was viewed as a dynamic structural element of social life recursively related to professionals’ collaborative actions through sensemaking processes. The study involved 57 participants. Face-to-face individual semi-structured interviews and organizational documents were the main sources of data. Deductive-inductive thematic analysis was adopted as strategy for data analysis. Findings: Three prevailing physicians’ identity roles were elicited: medical expert, care coordinator, and team member. These professional identities, not mutually exclusive, were instantiated in three specific modalities of collaboration: quasi-inexistent, restrained, and extended. The entanglement of a particular identity role and a specific collaborative practice became meaningful through a complex net of organizational and institutional features, and patients’ nosological profiles.

Relationships Among Structures, Team Processes, and Outcomes for Service Users in Quebec Mental Health Service Networks

“…Team effectiveness is associated with processes such as work role performance (i.e. actions and behaviors of team members involved in executing tasks) [17,18], professional autonomy [19], team collaboration [20], and decision-making [21]. A recent study found that combinations of different organizational cultures were associated with higher levels of perceived integrated care among patients [22].…”

Women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer program to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomized controlled study

“…To successfully test new economic and social methods for improving patient management during pregnancy and early motherhood, especially for women in precarious situations, we need to proactively encourage buy-in from the professionals who will deliver these interventions. It may be possible to accomplish this by shifting managerial paradigms (33) or by developing new health organizations, by rede ning the roles of health professionals and patients, and by co-constructing an adapted follow-up procedure (34,35). Health professionals may need to be convinced that recipients experience nancial incentives as a redistribution of wealth to those who need it and not as a stigma.…”

Applying the International Classification Of Functioning, Disability And Health (ICF) And Kawa Models In Family Medicine - A Case Of An Adolescent With A Stroke.

“…e rise of care planning due to the increased prevalence of complex and chronic diseases has led to the increasing role of FPs in multidisciplinary care. 14,15 It is essential to ensure that everyone in the team understands each other's scope of practice, strengths and experiences. is requires sharing of power, trust and self-awareness.…”