Professional Coaching

Risley, Kristina; Cooper, Hanna

doi:10.1177/1524839911413127

Cited by 6 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Eight papers [ 11 , 24 – 30 ] were rated strong and 11 papers were rated moderate [ 31 – 41 ]. Most of the moderate ratings were due to theories, models or frameworks being implied versus explicitly stated.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eleven papers were published between 2005 and 2011 [ 26 , 28 – 30 , 32 , 33 , 37 – 41 ] and eight published between 2012 and 2016 [ 11 , 25 , 27 , 29 , 31 , 34 – 36 ]. Five of the papers were published in Canada [ 27 , 28 , 34 , 35 , 38 ], five in the United States [ 26 , 30 , 37 , 40 , 41 ], two in Australia [ 24 , 33 ], two in Europe [ 29 , 31 ] and one in the United Kingdom [ 39 ]. Four of the papers did not state a specific country [ 11 , 25 , 32 , 36 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, some papers focused on developing ‘systems’ capacity [ 26 , 28 , 31 , 33 – 35 , 38 , 40 ], whereas other papers focused on developing field specific practitioner capacity (e.g., nutrition, mental health, pharmacists, infection disease control) [ 24 , 27 , 30 , 32 , 36 , 37 , 39 ]. Four papers focused on building individual capacity in areas such as technical assistance [ 25 ], evidence-based interventions [ 11 ], coaching [ 41 ], and policy [ 29 ]. Nine of the papers specifically focused on public health practice [ 26 , 28 , 30 – 34 , 38 , 41 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four papers focused on building individual capacity in areas such as technical assistance [ 25 ], evidence-based interventions [ 11 ], coaching [ 41 ], and policy [ 29 ]. Nine of the papers specifically focused on public health practice [ 26 , 28 , 30 – 34 , 38 , 41 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Related to study design, nine of the papers included a literature review as part of their methods [ 11 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 31 , 32 , 34 – 36 ], five were case studies [ 28 , 29 , 37 , 39 , 41 ], and three were commentaries [ 26 , 38 , 40 ]. One study [ 33 ] used in-depth interviews and workshops to explore date collected with public health experts and another study used a quasi-experimental design [ 30 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Theories, models and frameworks used in capacity building interventions relevant to public health: a systematic review

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThere is limited research on capacity building interventions that include theoretical foundations. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify underlying theories, models and frameworks used to support capacity building interventions relevant to public health practice. The aim is to inform and improve capacity building practices and services offered by public health organizations.MethodsFour search strategies were used: 1) electronic database searching; 2) reference lists of included papers; 3) key informant consultation; and 4) grey literature searching. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are outlined with included papers focusing on capacity building, learning plans, professional development plans in combination with tools, resources, processes, procedures, steps, model, framework, guideline, described in a public health or healthcare setting, or non-government, government, or community organizations as they relate to healthcare, and explicitly or implicitly mention a theory, model and/or framework that grounds the type of capacity building approach developed. Quality assessment were performed on all included articles. Data analysis included a process for synthesizing, analyzing and presenting descriptive summaries, categorizing theoretical foundations according to which theory, model and/or framework was used and whether or not the theory, model or framework was implied or explicitly identified.ResultsNineteen articles were included in this review. A total of 28 theories, models and frameworks were identified. Of this number, two theories (Diffusion of Innovations and Transformational Learning), two models (Ecological and Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation) and one framework (Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning) were identified as the most frequently cited.ConclusionsThis review identifies specific theories, models and frameworks to support capacity building interventions relevant to public health organizations. It provides public health practitioners with a menu of potentially usable theories, models and frameworks to support capacity building efforts. The findings also support the need for the use of theories, models or frameworks to be intentional, explicitly identified, referenced and for it to be clearly outlined how they were applied to the capacity building intervention.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4919-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Theories, models and frameworks used in capacity building interventions relevant to public health: a systematic review

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Zukunft der Personalentwicklung in der Pflege

Tewes¹

2014

Personalentwicklung in Pflege- Und Gesundheitseinrichtungen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Perceptions of Professional Leadership Coaches Regarding the Roles and Challenges of Nurse Managers

Bradley

Moore

2019

JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to explore professional coaches’ perceptions of nurse managers (NMs) and the NM role. BACKGROUND Nurse Managers are often inadequately prepared, developed, and supported in their roles. Professional coaching is a strategy that may prove beneficial to help prepare NMs for their roles. METHODS A qualitative design using researcher-participant interviews of 11 professional coaches provided data regarding coaches’ perceptions of NMs and the role development needs. RESULTS Coaches reported why they made the decision to coach NMs, why NMs sought coaching services, how the NM experience differed from that of higher level leaders, and what the coaches believed was their most valuable contribution when working with NMs. CONCLUSION Findings suggest that coaches can provide needed support to NMs to maximize their role effectiveness and preparedness.

show abstract

Professional Coaching

Cited by 6 publications

References 1 publication

Theories, models and frameworks used in capacity building interventions relevant to public health: a systematic review

Theories, models and frameworks used in capacity building interventions relevant to public health: a systematic review

Zukunft der Personalentwicklung in der Pflege

The Perceptions of Professional Leadership Coaches Regarding the Roles and Challenges of Nurse Managers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About