1921
DOI: 10.1038/108023a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prof. G. T. Ladd

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1922
1922
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it seems that differences in experimental procedure are the reason for the differences in the literature. In studies in which a continuous intravenous infusion of secretin was given, secretin in a dose of 2 CU/kg/h was effective in reducing ab sorption [3][4][5]7]. Secretin in a dose of 1 CU/kg/h inhibited jejunal absorption in our and in another study [4]; however, it was not effective in two other studies [5,7], Exploration of the dose response of je junal absorption to a continuous intrave nous infusion of secretin would clarify the lowest dose of secretin required to reduce absorption in the jejunum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it seems that differences in experimental procedure are the reason for the differences in the literature. In studies in which a continuous intravenous infusion of secretin was given, secretin in a dose of 2 CU/kg/h was effective in reducing ab sorption [3][4][5]7]. Secretin in a dose of 1 CU/kg/h inhibited jejunal absorption in our and in another study [4]; however, it was not effective in two other studies [5,7], Exploration of the dose response of je junal absorption to a continuous intrave nous infusion of secretin would clarify the lowest dose of secretin required to reduce absorption in the jejunum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous workers showed that secretin inhibited the absorption of water and elec trolytes or glucose from the jejunum of the rat [2] and man [3][4][5]7], although there have been reports that secretin had no ef fect upon the absorption from the jejunum of the hamster [1] and rat [6,10,11], Se cretin did not reduce jejunal absorption, when it was given in an in vitro system [1], under anesthesia by pentobarbital [6,10,11], or by single intravenous injection [6,10], On the contrary, secretin was effective in reducing absorption when it was given by continuous intravenous infusion to con scious humans [3][4][5]7] and to our sedated dogs. Therefore, it seems that differences in experimental procedure are the reason for the differences in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The life and work of Wundt have been referred to or reviewed by Kraepelin (51), Titchener (90,91), Wirth (106), by his American Students (84), and by an anonymous writer (120). Ladd's work has been eulogized by Hicks (47), and Seashore (79). Brentano has been given his place temporarily in the science by Kraus (52), and Titchener (89).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%