Produtividade de uvas e composição do mosto de videiras ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ fertilizadas com composto orgânico e ureia

Brunetto, Gustavo; Ceretta, Carlos Alberto; Melo, G. W. B. de; Miotto, Alcione; Ferreira, Paulo Ademar Avelar; Couto, Rafael da Rosa; Silva, Lincon Oliveira Stefanello da; Garlet, Luana Paula; Somavilla, Luiza Michelon; Cancian, Adriana; Ambrosini, Vítor Gabriel

doi:10.5965/223811711722018212

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The short-term effects of different fertilization schemes on grape nutritional ingredients have been extensively studied. For example, Thomidis et al [31] reported a large sugar content with high N input treatments, and the soluble solids content with a manure treatment was higher than that with a synthetic fertilizer treatment [9]. These results were consistent with our findings.…”

Section: Effect Of Long-term Fertilization On Grape Yield and Qualitysupporting

confidence: 92%

“…These results were consistent with our findings. However, Brunetto, Ceretta, Melo, Miotto, Ferreira, Couto, Silva, Garlet, Somavilla, Cancian, and Ambrosini [9] found that a manure treatment produced a higher titratable acidity content than a synthetic fertilizer treatment. The tannin and total phenolic contents were also significantly higher under a manure treatment [32].…”

Section: Effect Of Long-term Fertilization On Grape Yield and Qualitymentioning

confidence: 98%

“…For instance, Martínez, Ortega, Janssens, and Fincheira [8] reported that a combination of organic and synthetic fertilizers was better at increasing grape yields than no fertilizer, synthetic fertilizer, or organic fertilizer applications alone. Brunetto, et al [9] showed that synthetic nitrogen fertilizer did not influence the nutritional contents of grapes, while manure decreased the soluble solids content and increased the total acidity content of grapes. Although the short-term responses of grape yields and nutritional ingredients to different fertilizers are well-known, the long-term cumulative grape productivity responses to different fertilizers may be complicated.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Fertilization Regulates Grape Yield and Quality in by Altering Soil Nutrients and the Microbial Community

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rational fertilization is a win-win strategy for rural incomes and environmental restoration in ecologically fragile regions. However, the long-term cumulative grape productivity response to soil fertility has rarely been quantified. Here, long-term fertilization experiments (over 15 years) in the desert–oasis transitional zone of Sinkiang, China, were used to evaluate the interactions among grape yield, quality, fertilization, soil nutrients, and microbial communities. There were five treatments, as follows: CK0 (no planting and no fertilizing); NP (synthetic nitrogen and phosphorus); M (manure only); NPM1 (0.25 times NP and 0.33 times M); and NPM2 (NP and 0.5 times M). The grape yield increased with the application of total nitrogen. The soluble solids and reducing sugar contents had significant positive linear correlations with grape yield, but the opposite trend was found between grape yield and titratable acidity and tannin contents. The redundancy analysis showed that fertilization, soil nutrients (soil organic carbon, available nitrogen, and dissolved organic nitrogen), and microbial communities (ratio of fungi to bacteria, ratio of Gram-negative bacteria to Gram-positive bacteria, and total phospholipid fatty acids) accounted for 31.9%, 19.7%, and 26.8% of the grape yield and nutritional ingredients, respectively. The path analysis identified that fertilization, soil nutrients, and the microbial communities were significantly positively associated with the grape yield, soluble solids, and reducing sugars, while their associations with titratable acidity, tannins, and phenols were significantly negative. These results suggested that fertilization is a viable strategy for regulating grape yields and grape quality because it alters soil fertility in ecologically fragile regions.

show abstract

Section: Effect Of Long-term Fertilization On Grape Yield and Qualitysupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Effect Of Long-term Fertilization On Grape Yield and Qualitymentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Fertilization Regulates Grape Yield and Quality in by Altering Soil Nutrients and the Microbial Community

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Döring et al [39] reported that the grapevines growing under organic management showed significantly lower growth and yield in comparison to the integrated treatment, which was associated with differences in growth and cluster weight. Brunetto et al [40] reported that in a first study season, grapevines under organic management showed higher yield than the conventional ones. However, no differences were found in yield in the second season Pou et al [11] reported that a mixture of perennial grasses and legumes as cover crops increased Ravaz index compared to no tillage and traditional tillage, offering a better balance between vegetative and reproductive growth.…”

Section: Grapevine Productivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Type of Management and Climatic Conditions on Productive Behavior, Oenological Potential, and Soil Characteristics of a ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ Vineyard

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: Degradation of soils and erosion have been described for most of the soils presented along the Maule Valley. Organic and integrated management promotes agroecosystem health, improving soil biological activity. Due to this, the aim of this research was to study the effect of organic, integrated, and conventional management on the productive, oenological and soil variables of a vineyard cultivated under semiarid conditions during 5 consecutive seasons; (2) Methods: Yield, grape and wine oenological, and soil physicochemical parameters were evaluated. Bioclimatic indices were calculated in the studied seasons; (3) Results: Conventional management allowed to improve yield and the number of bunches per vine compared to organic management. However, this latter enhanced mineral nitrogen and potassium content in soil. Based on bioclimatic indices, heat accumulation improved number of bunches per plant and most of the soil physicochemical parameters; (4) Conclusions: Organic management improved the accumulation of some microelements in soils at the expense of yield. Organic matter decreased along the study was carried out. Season was the conditioning factor of the variability of most of the studied parameters, while the interaction between season and type of management affected soluble solids, probable alcohol and pH in grapes, and total polyphenol index and pH in wines.

show abstract

Assessing the effect of application of organic manures and grapevine pruned biomass on Thompson Seedless

Upadhyay

Verma

Sharma

et al. 2022

EJSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our soil continues to grapple with a number of familiar challenges like soil infertility, unfavourable soil conditions, and declining soil health as well as quality. These issues are caused by the ongoing crises of climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution, and excessive fertilizer usage alone in intensive cropping. Deterioration of soil health can be alleviated by application of organic fertilizers. With this background, the current experiment was conducted during 2013- 2016 to evaluate the effect of different organic sources viz. farm yard manure (FYM), green manure, press mud compost and grapevine pruning residue on Thompson Seedless and soil organic carbon content. Results indicated that maximum yield of 19.50 t/ha was obtained in T3 (press mud @15ton/ha). The increase in yield was +10.36% and +4.62% over T1 (only Fertigation schedule) and T2 (FYM), respectively. Maximum petiole potassium concentration (1.63%) was recorded in T3 at fruit bud differentiation stage. The soil organic carbon was highest in T4 (FYM @7.5 ton/ha and Press mud @ 7.5 ton/ha) among all the treatments. The increase was +5.6%, +66.66% and +63.56% over T1 in first, second and third year respectively. The gross returns (Rs. 319945/-), net profit (Rs. 121170/-) as well as cost benefit ratio (0.61) was maximum in case of press mud among all the organic sources. On the basis of obtained results, it can be concluded that use of press mud compost or press mud and FYM may be recommended as an organic fertilizer to improve yield and petiole nutrient content of Thompson Seedless as well as soil organic carbon content.

show abstract

Produtividade de uvas e composição do mosto de videiras ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ fertilizadas com composto orgânico e ureia

Cited by 4 publications

References 17 publications

Fertilization Regulates Grape Yield and Quality in by Altering Soil Nutrients and the Microbial Community

Fertilization Regulates Grape Yield and Quality in by Altering Soil Nutrients and the Microbial Community

Influence of Type of Management and Climatic Conditions on Productive Behavior, Oenological Potential, and Soil Characteristics of a ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ Vineyard

Assessing the effect of application of organic manures and grapevine pruned biomass on Thompson Seedless

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About