Produktionscontrolling in Dienstleistungsunternehmungen

Corsten, Hans; Corsten, Martina

doi:10.15358/0935-0381_2013_8-9_441

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…114 In a recent article, Thomas Corsten collected the sources on the four major towns of the Kibyratis (Kibyra, Balboura, Boubon and Termessos by Oinoanda), and tried to show that all of these are very likely colonies founded in course of the expansion of Pisidian Termessos. 115 As Strabon states, 116 the Pisidians relocated and refounded the city of Kibyra, and although he does not mention when this took place, it is on account of the archaeological material, best dated to the late 3 rd /early 2 nd century B.C. 117 At about the same time, Balboura was newly founded, even though older traces of settlement can be found in the area of the later settlement.…”

Section: The Termessians and Oinoandamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…115 As Strabon states, 116 the Pisidians relocated and refounded the city of Kibyra, and although he does not mention when this took place, it is on account of the archaeological material, best dated to the late 3 rd /early 2 nd century B.C. 117 At about the same time, Balboura was newly founded, even though older traces of settlement can be found in the area of the later settlement. 118 The city of Boubon, too, goes back to the pre-hellenistic period, but here again, particular building activities in the third century can be discerned.…”

Section: The Termessians and Oinoandamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…118 The city of Boubon, too, goes back to the pre-hellenistic period, but here again, particular building activities in the third century can be discerned. 119 Additionally, the personal names and literary tradition closely link the four cities Kibyra, Balboura, Boubon and Termessos pros Oinoandois to Termessos Maior and the Pisidians. 120 The earliest archaeological remains in the city of Termessos by Oinoanda go back to the early 2 nd century B.C., 121 and even though no full-scale excavations have been possible until now, it should be safe to say that this may be the oldest settlement layer.…”

Section: The Termessians and Oinoandamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Tlos, Oinoanda and the Hittite Invasion of the Lukka lands. Some Thoughts on the History of North-Western Lycia in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages

Gander

2014

Klio

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary: The present article contains observations on the invasion of Lycia by the Hittite king Tudhaliya IV as described in the Yalburt inscription. The author questions the commonly found identification of the land of VITIS/Wiyanwanda with the city of Oinoanda on account of the problems raised by the reading of the sign VITIS as well as of archaeological and strategical observations. With the aid of Lycian and Greek inscriptions the author argues that the original Wiyanawanda/Oinoanda was located further south than the city commonly known as Oinoanda situated above İncealiler. These insights lead to a reassessment of the Hittite-Luwian sources concerning the conquest of Lycia.Keywords: Lycia, Lykien, Lukka, Hethiter, Luwier, politische Geographie, griechische Epigraphik, lykische Epigraphik IntroductionEver since the beginning of research in Hittite political geography, two methodological approaches have basically been used. The first is mainly to collect toponyms known from Greek, Roman, Byzantine or even later sources and to identify them with Hittite places. This approach has been applied by Garstang, Forrer and others in their early works on Hittite geography. 1 This method has produced convincing results in the Levant and parts of Mesopotamia, but in Asia Minor the results of scholars were differing and often lacked convincing  Max Gander: Historisches Seminar der Universität Zürich, Fachbereich Alte Geschichte, Karl Schmid-Str. 4, CH-8006 Zürich, E-Mail: max.r.gander@gmail.com  1 Hrozný (1919); Forrer (1926). For the problematics of this approach even for classical sites, s. Robert -Robert (1977). power.2 The heavy criticism of Smith 3 against Forrer, Hrozný, Mayer and Garstang at first did not find support in the scholarly community. 4 The belief that cumulative evidence of several toponyms in the same region was enough was deep-rooted and widespread. 5 This method however lost much of its credibility when Goetze in 1940 showed that Kizzuwatna did not, as assumed by Hrozný, Garstang, Forrer and others, lie in the Pontos area but rather covered most of classical Plain Cilicia, 6 and therefore, all the respective equations given by these scholars were obviously wrong.Goetze, in his own work, tried much more to understand Hittite geography from within. He examined the relations between different cities and countries, and tried to come to a relative geography. 7The possibilities and the disadvantages of both the approaches are evident. The thorough investigation in the primary sources, taking into account the texts, the monuments and the location of roads and settlements is the starting point of any study devoted to Hittite political geography. However, since there are very few fixed points in Hittite geography, this kind of approach alone can only provide glimpses of a relative geography which do not allow for a clear identification of new sites.On the other hand, the disadvantages of the name equations that may produce whole series of wrong identifications has been mentioned above. Although one...

show abstract

Section: The Termessians and Oinoandamentioning

confidence: 99%