2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2017.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Products of Eisenstein series and Fourier expansions of modular forms at cusps

Abstract: We show, for levels of the form N = p a q b N ′ with N ′ squarefree, that in weights k ≥ 4 every cusp form f ∈ S k (N ) is a linear combination of products of certain Eisenstein series of lower weight. In weight k = 2 we show that the forms f which can be obtained in this way are precisely those in the subspace generated by eigenforms g with L(g, 1) = 0. As an application of such representations of modular forms we can calculate Fourier expansions of modular forms at arbitrary cusps and we give several example… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their insight provides a precise connection between the resulting expressions for cuspidal Hecke eigenforms and the special values of the associated L-functions. This connection also appeared in subsequent work by Borisov-Gunnells [4][5][6], who investigated specific modular forms associated with toric varieties, Kohnen-Martin [17], the first named author [23], and Dickson-Neururer [11], who investigated the case of higher levels. The nonvanishing of specific L-values was crucial in all cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Their insight provides a precise connection between the resulting expressions for cuspidal Hecke eigenforms and the special values of the associated L-functions. This connection also appeared in subsequent work by Borisov-Gunnells [4][5][6], who investigated specific modular forms associated with toric varieties, Kohnen-Martin [17], the first named author [23], and Dickson-Neururer [11], who investigated the case of higher levels. The nonvanishing of specific L-values was crucial in all cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…We now explain the three key differences of the present paper compared to previous work [4][5][6]11,17,18]. The first key difference is the appearance of E k (N ) as opposed to E k (N ) ∞ .…”
Section: Theorem 1 Let K L and N Be Positive Integers Then There Imentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations