2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1331-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Productivity responses to altered rainfall patterns in a C 4 -dominated grassland

Abstract: Rainfall variability is a key driver of ecosystem structure and function in grasslands worldwide. Changes in rainfall patterns predicted by global climate models for the central United States are expected to cause lower and increasingly variable soil water availability, which may impact net primary production and plant species composition in native Great Plains grasslands. We experimentally altered the timing and quantity of growing season rainfall inputs by lengthening inter-rainfall dry intervals by 50%, red… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

30
345
8
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 411 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
30
345
8
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Responses of aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) to experimental repackaging of ambient rainfall into fewer, larger rainfall events depend on site productivity (37). At a less productive experimental site, ANPP increased in response to such an experimental repackaging (38), whereas at a more productive site, ANPP decreased in response to the manipulation (39). These contrasting responses align with our model predictions for allocation to leaves with decreasing λ at low and high total annual rainfall, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Responses of aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) to experimental repackaging of ambient rainfall into fewer, larger rainfall events depend on site productivity (37). At a less productive experimental site, ANPP increased in response to such an experimental repackaging (38), whereas at a more productive site, ANPP decreased in response to the manipulation (39). These contrasting responses align with our model predictions for allocation to leaves with decreasing λ at low and high total annual rainfall, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…[WGII 4.4.10] Grassland and savanna productivity is highly sensitive to precipitation variability. In assessments of tall-grass prairie productivity, for example, increased rainfall variability was more significant than rainfall amount, with a 50% increase in dry-spell duration causing a 10% reduction in net primary productivity (Fay et al, 2003a …”
Section: ]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1I), suggesting that the plants were stressed despite growing in the greenhouse. However, plant growth may be more limited by increased variation in the timing of precipitation rather than total rainfall (e.g., Fay et al 2003). Consequently, we cannot rule out that costs of plasticity in physiological traits of Lobelia may be more apparent under variable field rather than more constant greenhouse conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%