1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8223(21)01673-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Productivity measurement in foodservice: Past accomplishments—a future alternative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the SBM-DEA efficiency model could increase the discrimination power of a decision making unit's efficiency score [19]. A measurement method that takes only one or a few input resources to produce outputs into consideration may lead to limitations and a potentially inaccurate efficiency assessment [35]. The SBM-DEA model considers multiple input resources and multiple outputs simultaneously to generate one efficiency index for menu items in the Japanese-and Chinese-style of restaurants.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the SBM-DEA efficiency model could increase the discrimination power of a decision making unit's efficiency score [19]. A measurement method that takes only one or a few input resources to produce outputs into consideration may lead to limitations and a potentially inaccurate efficiency assessment [35]. The SBM-DEA model considers multiple input resources and multiple outputs simultaneously to generate one efficiency index for menu items in the Japanese-and Chinese-style of restaurants.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In internal analyses, these variables are inadequate and do not accurately represent efficiency. Total factor productivity models are insufficient to evaluate several units with varying labor characteristics (Brown and Hoover, 1990). To put it another way, both total and partial factor ratios provide an average outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%