2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Productivity, innovation and R&D: Micro evidence for Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
241
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 428 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
10
241
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the output side of innovation, many studies highlight the merits of innovation surveys in providing direct proxies for product and process innovations (see Griffith et al 2006;Parisi et al 2006;Hall et al 2008Hall et al , 2009), beyond traditional focus on patents. However, as a matter of fact, only few works consider the relation between sales growth and proxies of innovative output alternative to patents.…”
Section: Innovative Inputs Innovative Outputs and Their Relation Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the output side of innovation, many studies highlight the merits of innovation surveys in providing direct proxies for product and process innovations (see Griffith et al 2006;Parisi et al 2006;Hall et al 2008Hall et al , 2009), beyond traditional focus on patents. However, as a matter of fact, only few works consider the relation between sales growth and proxies of innovative output alternative to patents.…”
Section: Innovative Inputs Innovative Outputs and Their Relation Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this aim, we adapt the CDM model to analyze this relationship for a panel of Spanish manufacturing firms between 1990 and 2005. Our econometric results suggest the existence of true state dependence both in the decision of 1 See, for example, Mohnen (2002, 2005) and Mohnen et al (2006) using French CIS1 and CIS3 data, Parisi et al (2006) for Italian manufacturing firms, Lööf and Heshmati (2006) using Swedish manufacturing data, Van Leeuwen and Klomp (2006) and Van Leeuven et al (2009) for Dutch manufacturing firms, and Griffith et al (2006) using firm-level data from the internationally harmonized CIS3 for France, Germany, Spain and the UK. Two examples for non-European countries are Benavente (2006) for Chile and Jefferson et al (2006) about China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, with some notable exceptions (Parisi et al 2006, Hall et al 2007, the vast majority of the relevant empirical work focuses on the first part of the causality equation only, i.e. on the link between innovation and firm productivity levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%