Productivity development of Norwegian institutions of higher education 2004–2013

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Previous issues of the memo-series are available in a PDF® format at: http://www.sv.uio.no/econ/english/research/unpublished-works/working-papers/ Abstract: Studies of productivity growth of institutions of higher education is of interest for two main reasons; education is an important factor for productivity growth of the economy, and in countries where higher education is funded by the public sector accountability of resource use is of key interest. Educational services consist of teaching, research and the "third mission" of dissemination of knowledge to the society at large. A bootstrapped Malmquist productivity change index is used to calculate productivity development for Norwegian institutions of higher education over the 10 year period 2004-2013. The confidence intervals from bootstrapping allow part of the uncertainty of point estimates stemming from sample variation to be revealed. The main result is that the majority of institutions have had a positive productivity growth over the total period. However, when comparing with growth in labour input the impact on productivity vary a lot. Terms of use: Documents in

A bootstrapped Malmquist index applied to Swedish district courts

“…This paper identifies an observation as a potential outlier if the output-based superefficiency score, assuming constant returns to scale (CRS), is below 0.75. This limit is used in, for example, the robustness investigation by Agrell and Niknazar (2014) and the empirical application by Edvardsen et al (2017).…”

From a strategic management perspective, comparison of graduate/undergraduate education performances of research universities and efficiency determinants: The case of Turkey

“…-Effects of external factors (Cherchye & Abeele, 2005;Fandel, 2007;Kuo & Ho, 2008;Lee, 2011;Warning, 2004;Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2017), Methodology approaches on the efficiency of HEIs other than DEA (derived from Günay & Dulupçu, 2019); (Agasisti & Pérez-Esparrells, 2010;Edvardsen et al, 2017;Flegg et al, 2004;Thanassoulis et al, 2011;Worthington & Lee, 2008),…”

Measurement of financial efficiency and productivity of Turkish Public Universities by using non-parametric methods

“…Alternative methodologies to DEA in literature for estimating the efficiency of HEIs have indeed increased meaningfully over the last two decades such as Malmquist index (Agasisti and Perez-Esparrells, 2010; Edvardsen et al , 2017; Flegg et al , 2004; Parteka and Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2013; Thanassoulis et al , 2011; Worthington and Lee, 2008), bootstrapping (Lee, 2011; Villano and Tran, 2018), robust frontiers (Bonaccorsi et al , 2006; Fernandez-Santos and Martinez-Campillo, 2015), metafrontier (Lu and Chen, 2013) or stochastic frontier analysis (Abbott and Doucouliagos, 2009; Johnes and Johnes, 2009; McMillian and Chan, 2006).…”

“…Moreover, in countries where the public sector funds higher education, accountability of resource use is of crucial interest. Conducting a study of HEIs concerning productivity change is vital to get information about the results for the considerable resources consumed out of public funds (Edvardsen et al , 2017).…”