Productivity and Impact of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-Related Academic Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Alfirević, Nikša; Perović, Lena Malešević; Kosor, Maja Mihaljević

doi:10.3390/su15097434

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2, established in 2015, aimed to end hunger, achieve food security, improve nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture by 2030. As we move past the initial 2030 target, the United Nations has advanced a new set of development goals to address the persisting and emerging challenges [1,2]. These renewed goals continue to prioritize food security but with an increased focus on climate resilience, equity in access, and the promotion of nutritious diets.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Refugee Preferences for SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) Solutions in Irbid Camp and Sakhra Region: Cultivated Roofs and Refrigerators as Food Banks Interventions

Alkharouf,

Shehadeh,

Khazaleh

et al. 2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Addressing hunger, particularly within impoverished communities in Jordan and globally, demands innovative, practical solutions. The research focused on refugee populations and their preferences for interventions aligned with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2: Zero Hunger remains limited. This study explores the preferences of refugees in the Irbid Camp and Sakhra region, Jordan, for two potential interventions—cultivated roofs (CRs) and refrigerators as food banks (RaFB). Surveys conducted among 402 households serve to determine refugee preferences in hunger reduction, the influence of demographic attributes on these choices, and the feasibility of each proposed intervention. Chi-square tests were utilized to establish correlations between refugee intervention preferences and demographic variables, such as age, gender, education level, and family size. The results reveal a strong preference (90%) for RaFB over CRs (10%). While no significant demographic influence was identified on the acceptance of CRs, a strong correlation was discovered between the education level and the acceptance of the RaFB intervention. RaFB was predominantly favored due to its lower implementation costs, reduced effort, lower risk, cultural compatibility, and demonstrated success in similar contexts. Conversely, highly educated refugees were more likely to reject RaFB, indicating potential influences from diverse cultural perspectives or access to alternate solutions. This study provides valuable insight into the potential advantages and challenges of implementing CRs and RaFB projects. It further underscores the need for policymakers to consider demographic factors and cultural nuances in future intervention designs to achieve SDG 2 more effectively.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%