2007
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbn001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Productivity and grazing impact of Oikopleura dioica (Tunicata, Appendicularia) in Tokyo Bay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…There were higher densities of copepods and O. dioica appendicularians in the transitional waters of the front, coinciding with a higher chlorophyll a concentration Ramirez 1996, Capitanio andEsnal 1998). Although both the biomass and abundance of copepods were higher than those of appendicularians, the latter had significantly higher production rates (Sato et al 2008, Jaspers et al 2009. While several experimental studies have shown an indirect interaction between calanoids and appendicularians, no studies have been carried out on the interactions between cyclopoids and appendicularians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were higher densities of copepods and O. dioica appendicularians in the transitional waters of the front, coinciding with a higher chlorophyll a concentration Ramirez 1996, Capitanio andEsnal 1998). Although both the biomass and abundance of copepods were higher than those of appendicularians, the latter had significantly higher production rates (Sato et al 2008, Jaspers et al 2009. While several experimental studies have shown an indirect interaction between calanoids and appendicularians, no studies have been carried out on the interactions between cyclopoids and appendicularians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Copepods are considered the most abundant mesozooplankton group in many pelagic environments (Kiørboe 1998), and along with appendicularians, they are the most important secondary producers (Gorsky and Fenaux 1998, Hopcroft and Roff 1998, Sato et al 2008. Both groups play an important role as consumBoth groups play an important role as consumers of both the phytoplankton and microbial components of food webs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a first step, the area_exc or feret result was converted to zooplankton dry mass with the relations established by Lehette and Hernandez-Léon (2009). In a second step, carbon was estimated from carbon to dry weight conversion factors available in the literature (Beers, 1966;Davis and Wiebe, 1985;Gibson and Paffenhöfer, 2002;Sato et al, 2008;Uye, 1982). To account for the contribution of Noctiluca sp., spherical volume was estimated from ESD measurements and converted to carbon based on Menden-Deuer and Lessard (2000).…”
Section: Mesozooplankton Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Com isso, podem reduzir drasticamente a biomassa fitoplanctônica, regular o tamanho da população e sua disponibilidade para outros herbívoros (Barnes & Hughes 1982, Esnal 1986, López-Urrutia et al 2005, Sato et al 2008. Porém, em ambientes costeiros e estuarinos esse mecanismo de alimentação pode contribuir para o aumento da transparência da água e a penetração de luz, estimulando o desenvolvimento do fitoplâncton (Dagg et al 1996, Fernández & Acuña 2003.…”
unclassified