2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352012000100027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Productive performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed at different frequencies and periods with automatic dispenser

Abstract: The performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) raised in cages furnished with an automatic dispenser, supplied at different frequencies (once per hour and once every two hours) and periods (daytime, nighttime and both) was evaluated. Eighteen 1.0m 3 cages were placed into a 2000m 2 pond, two meters deep with a 5% water exchange. One hundred and seventy tilapias, with initial weight of 16.0±4.9g, were dispersed into each 1m 3 cage and the feed ration was adjusted every 21 days with biometry. Data was c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting mashes were applied at a daily ration of 5 % average body weight of O. niloticus at the start of the study. In order to reflect decrease in metabolic rate as fish grow (Sousa et al 2012), the feeding rate was reduced to 4 and 3 % when the average weight of O. niloticus reached >50 and >100 g respectively. Fish were fed by hands twice daily between 0900 and 1000 h and 1500 and 1600 h by broadcasting at the periphery of each pond.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting mashes were applied at a daily ration of 5 % average body weight of O. niloticus at the start of the study. In order to reflect decrease in metabolic rate as fish grow (Sousa et al 2012), the feeding rate was reduced to 4 and 3 % when the average weight of O. niloticus reached >50 and >100 g respectively. Fish were fed by hands twice daily between 0900 and 1000 h and 1500 and 1600 h by broadcasting at the periphery of each pond.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in most studies, the frequencies examined are relatively low and range from once a day to eight times a day, with very few studies examining frequencies >12 times a day. Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of high feeding frequencies (above 12 times a day) results in improved performance and lower environmental impact of the crops (Castro et al, ; Sousa et al, ). Evaluating different feeding frequencies for the cultivation of common snook Centropomus undecimalis (Bloch, 1792), the values obtained for final weight, condition factor, specific growth rate and daily weight gain were significantly higher for the frequency of 12 times a day compared with low frequencies (Herrera, Kuhnen, & Sanches, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under ad libitum conditions, enzyme activities were maintained at high level, with a slight decrease at noon, but both experiments showed a markedly high nocturnal enzymatic activity. Sousa et al (2012), however, compared night-, daytime-, and mixed feeding schedules, getting lower feed effi ciency at night, because of that they proposed to optimize feeding offering feed before the sunset, to closesynchronize the moment of the highest digestive enzymes activity with the fi lling of gastrointestinal tract of fi sh.…”
Section: Discussion Basal Digestibility (Fasting Conditions)mentioning
confidence: 99%