2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Productive efficiency of the pelagic trawl fisheries in the Southern Black Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 32 , 33 ] and then extended by Refs. [ 34 , 35 ], is a good approach to capture the sensitivity of catch to random shocks, such as weather, resource availability and other environmental factors [ 6 , 11 , 32 ]. The greatest virtue of such an approach is that it captures the impact of random shocks on the intended output i.e., the amount of catch [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[ 32 , 33 ] and then extended by Refs. [ 34 , 35 ], is a good approach to capture the sensitivity of catch to random shocks, such as weather, resource availability and other environmental factors [ 6 , 11 , 32 ]. The greatest virtue of such an approach is that it captures the impact of random shocks on the intended output i.e., the amount of catch [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the efficiency level of fishers can be improved either through 1 the introduction of new technology or by the utilization of existing technology to its full potential [ 5 ]. In the other countries, the fishery sector has undergone tremendous technological change and progress in the last century [ 6 ]. However, the fishery of Lake Tana is still predominantly small-scale or artisanal type that can be characterized by a non-mechanized and low level of production [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature of the aquaculture economy, there were many studies carried out to determine the difference between efficient and inefficient farms in production (Sharma et al, 1999;Cinemre et al, 2006;Theodoridis et al, 2017;Vinh et al, 2020;Dağtekin et al, 2021). Fernández Sánchez et al (2020) investigated the technical efficiency (TE) of sea bass and sea bream farming in the Mediterranean Sea by European firms and calculated all countries' average TE coefficients as 0.891; farms had an efficiency coefficient of less than 0.891 was considered inefficient.…”
Section: Grouping the Sea Bass Farms As Efficient And Inefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the realm of fisheries economics, the evaluation of technical efficiency has emerged as a pivotal tool for assessing the performance and sustainability of fishing operations (Coglan and Pascoe, 2007;Yang et al, 2017;Kiyama and Yamazaki, 2018;Sangün et al, 2018;Gómez and Maynou, 2020;Da gtekin et al, 2021). Nevertheless, several approaches can be found in the literature with regard to the choice of the relevant inputs and outputs on which efficiency measurement should be based.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%