2016
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201500428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production Rate‐Dependent Key Performance Indicators for a Systematic Design of Biochemical Downstream Processes

Abstract: Key performance indicators have become a common tool in bioprocess development, as they allow an objective and independent rating and ranking of process alternatives screened. A disadvantage of all key performance indicators developed so far is their strong focus on costs, which makes them neglect the influence of the production rate on the profit of the process. But, since both production costs and production rate have an equally strong impact, both should be considered when decisions have to be made. Therefo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The downstream processing costs to recover products from these dilute streams have been analyzed in the literature, especially for biofuels from microalgae (Davis et al, 2011;Rizwan et al, 2013), and most studies indicate that more than 70% of the overall production costs are incurred during separations (Brandt and Schembecker, 2016;Kiss et al, 2015;Shaeiwitz et al, 2000;Sikdar et al, 1989).…”
Section: Eff (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The downstream processing costs to recover products from these dilute streams have been analyzed in the literature, especially for biofuels from microalgae (Davis et al, 2011;Rizwan et al, 2013), and most studies indicate that more than 70% of the overall production costs are incurred during separations (Brandt and Schembecker, 2016;Kiss et al, 2015;Shaeiwitz et al, 2000;Sikdar et al, 1989).…”
Section: Eff (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major goals in the design of a large scale commercial process is the minimization of processing cost while maintaining product specifications. In the production of biochemicals, downstream separation is the major cost driver (Brandt and Schembecker, 2016;Kiss et al, 2015;Shaeiwitz et al, 2000).…”
Section: Separation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bioreactor effluent is often dilute (less than 20 wt% product) [17] and the purity requirement for chemicals is relatively high. Therefore, downstream separation tends to be expensive, accounting for 60-80% of the total production cost in many cases [10,18,19]. Thus, the synthesis of an effective downstream bio-separation process is a critical but at the same time challenging task because multiple technologies are usually available for a given separation task, and thus a large number of alternative process networks exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renewable and environmentally friendly production of biochemicals and fuels via conversion of readily available plant biomass and waste streams is of major importance for society, economy, and environment in the 21st century [1,2]. Microbial fermentation of waste gas streams and synthesis gas (syngas; comprised mainly of CO and H 2 ), which represent a significant quantity of reduced carbon and can be produced relatively cheaply from a wide variety of biomass sources, is an emerging conversion route with wide feedstock versatility [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 shows a simplified schematic diagram of a bubble-column reactor for microbial syngas fermentation. The gas stream containing CO, H 2 , and possibly other components such as CO 2 is introduced into the bottom of the column and exits the top of the column. The liquid stream containing media components such as vitamins, minerals, nitrogen, and phosphorus required for cellular growth also is introduced into the bottom of the column.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%