2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.05.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production potential and stability of hydrate-bearing sediments at the site GMGS3-W19 in the South China Sea: A preliminary feasibility study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, TOUGH + HYDRATE 62 software was employed to address this issue because the software was generally used to simulate gas recovery from hydrate reservoirs in marine and permafrost regions, 27,28,30,[63][64][65] The geomechanical response was not considered because the influence of effective stress variation on the sediment and fracture properties in GHBS at this site during depressurization is currently unclear, even though the coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical model was proposed and used to perform the coupling processes during drilling and gas recovery. 25,29,[66][67][68][69][70][71][72] However, the assigned permeability of fractures takes the influence of the effective stress into account. The latter means that the value adopted is the experimental measurement in other sediments after which the bottom hole pressure remains constant after initially decreasing (i.e., the assigned fracture permeability is measured at the corresponding effective confining pressure condition).…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Codementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, TOUGH + HYDRATE 62 software was employed to address this issue because the software was generally used to simulate gas recovery from hydrate reservoirs in marine and permafrost regions, 27,28,30,[63][64][65] The geomechanical response was not considered because the influence of effective stress variation on the sediment and fracture properties in GHBS at this site during depressurization is currently unclear, even though the coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical model was proposed and used to perform the coupling processes during drilling and gas recovery. 25,29,[66][67][68][69][70][71][72] However, the assigned permeability of fractures takes the influence of the effective stress into account. The latter means that the value adopted is the experimental measurement in other sediments after which the bottom hole pressure remains constant after initially decreasing (i.e., the assigned fracture permeability is measured at the corresponding effective confining pressure condition).…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, many investigations (eg, Refs. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] have been performed recently, and numerical simulations have still focused on depressurization that is aimed at commercial production from potential target areas. In practice, depressurization has also been widely adopted in field trials in Mallik, 34 the eastern Nankai Trough, 35,36 and the South China Sea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies had shown the validity of this approximation [8,49]. The composite thermal conductivity, relative permeability, and capillary pressure models are employed commonly in numerical simulations on gas production from HBS [1,4,[30][31][32]50]. The corresponding parameters for relative permeability and capillary pressure were determined from the field test data by Moridis and Reagan [51].…”
Section: Model Geometry and Spatial Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They indicated that the balance between gas production and reservoir stability is needed to be optimized. The further investigation about the geomechanical behaviors of the HBS induced by gas production indicated that the spatial evolution of the temperature, pore pressure, hydrate saturation, and gas saturation are the most relevant factors [1,[30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation