2014
DOI: 10.1080/00472336.2014.960880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production Politics and Migrant Labour Advocacy in Singapore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, workers tend to be deployed by subcontractors in small teams across several construction sites. So they lack the power of collective action when they informally negotiate workloads and rest periods with supervisors (Bal 2015b). Instead, they are susceptible to threats of early termination and repatriation, which are occasionally used as a disciplinary technique to direct work Yea 2017).…”
Section: Diffusion Of Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, workers tend to be deployed by subcontractors in small teams across several construction sites. So they lack the power of collective action when they informally negotiate workloads and rest periods with supervisors (Bal 2015b). Instead, they are susceptible to threats of early termination and repatriation, which are occasionally used as a disciplinary technique to direct work Yea 2017).…”
Section: Diffusion Of Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). Even when the unions offer support, they do so in a way which undercuts the collective mobilisation of workers (Bal 2015b). For instance, in 2009, the National Trades Union Congress set up the Migrant Workers Centre to address the welfare needs of workers in workplace disputes.…”
Section: Displacement Of Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While academic interest in civil society in Singapore has grown in parallel with these developments, existing literature remains largely preoccupied with the dominant role played by the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) in opening up and closing down spaces for civil society engagement (Chua, ; Lee, ; Lyons, ; Piper, ; Chua, ; Ortmann, ). In these accounts, the political opportunity structure for civil society has generally been described as “closed”, or as Bal (: 220) more baldly puts it, a “near‐absolute lack of opportunity for NGOs to pursue their agendas”. Yet in focusing on the constraining impact that political institutions and national structures exert on Singapore's civil society, the latter's agency in carving its own political space of contention is often overlooked (Kemp and Kfir, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%