1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01845695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production planning of FMS under tool magazine constraints: A dynamic programming approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al (1996) discussed improvement of tool‐scheduling strategies, combinations of different scheduling rules are being used for tool exchange and through simulation machine tool utilization is analyzed. Rau and Chetty (1996) developed a dynamic programming algorithm to minimize unbalanced workload of machines. They considered the system setup involving part type selection, pallet and fixture assignment, production ratios, and part and tool allocation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al (1996) discussed improvement of tool‐scheduling strategies, combinations of different scheduling rules are being used for tool exchange and through simulation machine tool utilization is analyzed. Rau and Chetty (1996) developed a dynamic programming algorithm to minimize unbalanced workload of machines. They considered the system setup involving part type selection, pallet and fixture assignment, production ratios, and part and tool allocation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Montazeri et al [5] had concluded that dispatching rules have a great impact on various system performance criteria, researchers started to investigate the relationship between various system performance criteria and the assigned dispatching rules for FMSs. Several methods have been proposed over the last decade and can be divided into several categories, including simulation-based and scheduling with dispatching rules [6][7], artificial intelligence (AI) approaches [8][9], dynamic programming approaches [10][11], heuristic approaches [3,[12][13], pre-emptive method [14], and the hybrid approaches [15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%