Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The generalization of Hydraulic fracturing in West Siberia and the increase of job size over the recent year can impact the field development strategy. The correct estimation of the fracture dimension is critical to maximize the recovery factor of heterogeneous reservoir developed with water flood. Three main uncertainties exist: fracture height, half-length and azimuth. Commercial fracture models provide length estimate once a reliable estimate of height is known. This is evident for 2D model which requires a direct knowledge of the height but also for p3D model where the height is indirectly obtained from coupling stress profile and fluid flow. Fracture azimuth is traditionally provided by the horizontal stress anisotropy from open hole sonic logging. Unfortunately, in West Siberia at depth of 2500–3000 meters, there is negligible tectonic and open hole sonic dipole did not provide obvious fracture orientation. Fracture height growth affect mostly fracture job size and cost. Height growth has also shown to be a cause of premature wellbore screen out. Fracture half-length and orientation can have a significant impact on the effectiveness of pressure maintenance and flood efficiency. A review of world publication of direct fracture geometry measurement has shown the validity of seismic methods and tilt indicators for tight rock, such as carbonates and tight sandstone. However, all experiments on soft sandstones, such as found in West Siberian, have shown more limited results. Given the uncertainties in effective Fracture geometry and the negative impact that they could have on the field development, Rosneft decided to invest in a field research study denominated Fracture Geometry Investigation, to validate various method offered by the service industry. Two basic methods were tested and combined: wellbore logging and passive seismic. Wellbore logging is used to obtain an estimate of wellbore fracture height. It combines temperature log immediately after Minifrac or after Frac and Cased Hole Sonic Anisotropy (CHSA) which can be run at any time after frac. The direct estimate of fracture height is used to validate the result of a calibrated HF simulator using Net Pressure matching analysis. Passive Seismic monitoring (PSM) is used to obtain direct estimate of height, length and azimuth. PSM Acquisition must be done during hydraulic fracturing from the nearest well. The main goal of this study was to validate each method's effectiveness and to construct a calibrated fracture model for the particular reservoir under investigation. The results of this investigation will be used to optimize fracture design, pressure maintenance strategy and pattern orientation. Fields and Reservoir Description The Priobskoe field, one of the largest oilfields in the world, is located in Western Siberia. The reservoirs under production are part of Cherkashinskaia set of rock [1, 2] composed of shales, siltstones and sandstones. 90% of the production for the Priobskoe oilfield comes from AC-10, AC-11 and AC-12. The main focus of this paper is on the AC-11 and AC-12 formations, where production development and enhancement activities have started in 2000. The AC-11 formation consists of laminated oil saturated sandstone. The average permeability of AC-11 formation is 8mD, and the porosity is 13–16%. The average oil saturation is 50–60% with reservoir pressure at 248 bars. The AC-12 formation situated below the AC-11 is characterized by complex and aerial heterogeneous structure of several sandstone bodies, which complicates HF application. AC-12 is oil saturated highly laminated sandstone with shale streaks in between. The average permeability of AC-12 formation is 1 to 2 mD, and the porosity is 14–18%. The average oil saturation is 50–66%, and the reservoir pressure about 255 bars. Malobalykskoe field is a large oilfield of West Siberia with a majority of reserves (about 80%) concentrated in Achimovskaya, a formation from the Cretaceous period. Formation BS16–22 of Achimovskaya is well developed covering all the area and is represented by alternation of sandstones, siltstones and argillites. This reservoir is separated from upper layer by clay bed with thickness from 1.4 to 86 meters. A cross-section of BS16–22 formation shows from 8 to 23 permeable layers. Average number of such layers is 10.8 with about 2 mD permeability and initial reservoir pressure of 278 bars.
The generalization of Hydraulic fracturing in West Siberia and the increase of job size over the recent year can impact the field development strategy. The correct estimation of the fracture dimension is critical to maximize the recovery factor of heterogeneous reservoir developed with water flood. Three main uncertainties exist: fracture height, half-length and azimuth. Commercial fracture models provide length estimate once a reliable estimate of height is known. This is evident for 2D model which requires a direct knowledge of the height but also for p3D model where the height is indirectly obtained from coupling stress profile and fluid flow. Fracture azimuth is traditionally provided by the horizontal stress anisotropy from open hole sonic logging. Unfortunately, in West Siberia at depth of 2500–3000 meters, there is negligible tectonic and open hole sonic dipole did not provide obvious fracture orientation. Fracture height growth affect mostly fracture job size and cost. Height growth has also shown to be a cause of premature wellbore screen out. Fracture half-length and orientation can have a significant impact on the effectiveness of pressure maintenance and flood efficiency. A review of world publication of direct fracture geometry measurement has shown the validity of seismic methods and tilt indicators for tight rock, such as carbonates and tight sandstone. However, all experiments on soft sandstones, such as found in West Siberian, have shown more limited results. Given the uncertainties in effective Fracture geometry and the negative impact that they could have on the field development, Rosneft decided to invest in a field research study denominated Fracture Geometry Investigation, to validate various method offered by the service industry. Two basic methods were tested and combined: wellbore logging and passive seismic. Wellbore logging is used to obtain an estimate of wellbore fracture height. It combines temperature log immediately after Minifrac or after Frac and Cased Hole Sonic Anisotropy (CHSA) which can be run at any time after frac. The direct estimate of fracture height is used to validate the result of a calibrated HF simulator using Net Pressure matching analysis. Passive Seismic monitoring (PSM) is used to obtain direct estimate of height, length and azimuth. PSM Acquisition must be done during hydraulic fracturing from the nearest well. The main goal of this study was to validate each method's effectiveness and to construct a calibrated fracture model for the particular reservoir under investigation. The results of this investigation will be used to optimize fracture design, pressure maintenance strategy and pattern orientation. Fields and Reservoir Description The Priobskoe field, one of the largest oilfields in the world, is located in Western Siberia. The reservoirs under production are part of Cherkashinskaia set of rock [1, 2] composed of shales, siltstones and sandstones. 90% of the production for the Priobskoe oilfield comes from AC-10, AC-11 and AC-12. The main focus of this paper is on the AC-11 and AC-12 formations, where production development and enhancement activities have started in 2000. The AC-11 formation consists of laminated oil saturated sandstone. The average permeability of AC-11 formation is 8mD, and the porosity is 13–16%. The average oil saturation is 50–60% with reservoir pressure at 248 bars. The AC-12 formation situated below the AC-11 is characterized by complex and aerial heterogeneous structure of several sandstone bodies, which complicates HF application. AC-12 is oil saturated highly laminated sandstone with shale streaks in between. The average permeability of AC-12 formation is 1 to 2 mD, and the porosity is 14–18%. The average oil saturation is 50–66%, and the reservoir pressure about 255 bars. Malobalykskoe field is a large oilfield of West Siberia with a majority of reserves (about 80%) concentrated in Achimovskaya, a formation from the Cretaceous period. Formation BS16–22 of Achimovskaya is well developed covering all the area and is represented by alternation of sandstones, siltstones and argillites. This reservoir is separated from upper layer by clay bed with thickness from 1.4 to 86 meters. A cross-section of BS16–22 formation shows from 8 to 23 permeable layers. Average number of such layers is 10.8 with about 2 mD permeability and initial reservoir pressure of 278 bars.
The giant Chicontepec field contains oil from 18 to 45 oAPI in laminated sandstones of 0.1 to 10 mD at a depth of around 2500 meters (8202 ft). Original Oil in Place (OOIP) is estimated to be 140, 900 MMSTB. The complex geology (complicated structural and stratigraphic nature of the reservoirs), lack of reservoir information and lack of technology availability caused a gap between discovery and development. Throughout a period of several decades some exploration wells were drilled based on 2D seismic and log correlations of the reservoirs. The exploitation of the Paleonchannel was postponed because most of the wells showed poor productivity. The reasons for the low recovery (around 3%) have never been thoroughly understood. Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain the deficient performance such as partial closing of the fractures with declining reservoir pressure (bubble-point pressure is near initial pressure), inadequate comprehension of the geological model, deficiency in the fracturing technology, oil-wetted or intermediate-wetted reservoirs, applicability of unconventional wells (horizontal wells, casing drilling technology), etc. Today, the Chicontepec Paleochannel is an intermediate stage. Due to the experience of different fields with similar characteristics, this paper describes an analysis of alternatives that may be considered to resolve the problems of exploitation at the Chicontepec field. Advanced technologies, hydraulic fractures, artificial lift systems, all of them combined with secondary and enhanced oil recovery, may be feasible to sustain or increase production. A number of hurdles will have to be overcome. This field, the second most important oil field in Mexico, should take advantage of the experience learned from these analogous reservoirs. Chicontepec Paleochannel Geographically, it is located in east-central Mexico in parts of the states of Veracruz, Puebla and Hidalgo. Chincontepec system was deposited under complex tectono-stratigraphic conditions. Geologically, it covers an area of 957,534 acres (Figure 1). Aproximately half of Chicontepec consists of shales or silty shales with the rest of the formation made up of multiple thin sandstones beds and zones of sandstones beds. Typically, between 8 and 16 major reservoirs are present. These set of reservoirs is composed of channel complexes that are flanked by, and rest on, lobe sandstones that grade into distal fan and basin floor deposits, resulting in high heterogeneity. Throughout a period of several decades some exploration wells were drilled based on 2D seismic and log correlations of the reservoirs. The 3D seismic allowed the identification of sand bodies with viable pay thickness. Some wells produce small amounts of water, in general, water-oil contacts have not been identified. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that the clay cointains dominantly kaolinite with a content of 1 to 5 %. The sandstones are immature litharenites consisting of quartz grains, abundant carbonate fragments, and granitic fragments. Because of the abundance of carbonate in the system, the sediments are highly cemented by ferroan calcite and ferroan dolomite, in addition to quartz overgrowths. Core analyses show that the reservoirs are characterized by both low porosity and low permeability, Figure 2. All the reservoirs have permeabilities of 0.1 to 10 mD and porosities ranging from 5 to 15 %. The effective permeability, as determined from build up, fall off, drawdown and step rate test or advance decline analysis, varies from 0.01 to 15 mD.
The Barnett shale is one of the most prolific gas reservoirs in United States and its success has continued into 2015, with the latest data showing that total gas production in the region is now about 5 Bcf/D. However, operators are increasingly aware that the productivity rate of Barnett wells shown to decline by an average of 70% in the first year. Additionally, as the result of the current down energy market it is necessary to implement new methodologies to sustain and optimize the production moving from the quantity of the wells to the quality of the production, from drilling more wells to enhance the production from the existing wells. To achieve this goal; it became crucial to choose the optimum artificial lift techniques and to use the right dose for chemical treatments that that work best in the Barnett to draw the well with minimum investment to maximize the cash flow.This paper illustrates the results of using an integrated methodology to evaluate and optimize the gas production for a brown field located in Dallas-Texas, USA. The methodology included a detailed field/wells production evaluation, optimization of the artificial lift system and design, review of the facilities configuration, identification of the flow challenges such as liquid loading, high line pressure and also down time management, Finally the study considered the economical evaluation for high lease operating expenses (LOE) wells. To make the work scalable and sustainable and to help engineers to be aware of any operational variance in timely manner two tools were implemented: 1) an artificial Lift screening methodology and 2) a surveillance tool for tracking the operational key performance indicator (KPIs) and containing an alarm system tool for spotting the variance.Out of 150 wells considered for this study, 94 wells have been identified for production optimization to obtain production enhancement. A set of seven wells has been taken as a pilot test covering two initiative; well cleaning and utilizing compressor to reduce the well head pressure. The results were as expected. Two wells under well cleaning show a 100 % increase in production because of the reduction in bottom hole pressure and achieving high draw down. The other five wells, under compressor initiative; show an average increase in production by 14 %. Additionally, the target is to reduce the number of the compressors by 25% using the proper artificial lift system and reduce the LOE by 10%.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.