2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12649-018-0440-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production, Optimization and Partial Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose from Gluconacetobacter xylinus TJU-D2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, under dry conditions, following lyophilisation to eliminate most of the water, it was typically found that the cellulose had a tensile strength of 240 mPa, an elongation at break of 5%, a maximum strain in other order of 4% and a Young’s modulus of 12 GPa, although it has been shown that a single strand of bacterial cellulose can have a Young’s modulus of 90 GPa. This is somewhat disappointing when compared to wet bacterial cellulose (99% water), as the mechanical properties indicate a tensile strength of 400 mPa, maximum strain in the order of 20%, and Young’s modulus of 130–145 GPa [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. The values for Young’s modulus in wet bacterial cellulose indicate that there is a high level of elasticity within the material in comparison to the lyophilised form.…”
Section: Intrinsic Properties Of Bacterial Cellulosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, under dry conditions, following lyophilisation to eliminate most of the water, it was typically found that the cellulose had a tensile strength of 240 mPa, an elongation at break of 5%, a maximum strain in other order of 4% and a Young’s modulus of 12 GPa, although it has been shown that a single strand of bacterial cellulose can have a Young’s modulus of 90 GPa. This is somewhat disappointing when compared to wet bacterial cellulose (99% water), as the mechanical properties indicate a tensile strength of 400 mPa, maximum strain in the order of 20%, and Young’s modulus of 130–145 GPa [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. The values for Young’s modulus in wet bacterial cellulose indicate that there is a high level of elasticity within the material in comparison to the lyophilised form.…”
Section: Intrinsic Properties Of Bacterial Cellulosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was used on a fully factorial design with 5 levels for the preliminary study and on a Box-Behnken experimental design for the optimization procedure (Ahmed et al 2019;Bae and Shoda 2005;Du et al 2018;Tan et al 2012). For the preliminary study 2 continuous explanatory variables (X 1 : harvest day, X 2 : inoculum volume) were chosen and 1 response variables variable (Y 1 : thickness).…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopy (Sem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OPTIMIZATION STUDY Experimental design and target optimal levels for the response parameters A Box-Behnken Design (BBD) experimental design (Ahmed et al 2019;Bae and Shoda 2005;Du et al 2018;Tan et al 2012) was used to optimize the fermentation conditions to obtain BC with properties t for biomedical purposes: drug release (Y 1 ) (Ullah et al 2017), mechanical properties (Y 2 ) (Li et al 2015b), structure (Y 3 ) (Wei et al 2011), as response variables. Two independent variables were considered at 3 levels: inoculum volume (X1) at 1 mL; 3 mL; and 5 mL; and fermentation period (X 2 ) at 6 d; 12 d; and 18 d. The levels were selected based on the results from our preliminary study, but also, according to current research (Bilgi et al 2016;Du et al 2018;Rangaswamy et al 2015;Zeng et al 2011). The BBD generated 15 experimental runs for the fermentation conditions (represented by X 1 and X 2 ) needed to obtain the target response variables (Y 1 , Y 2 , Y 3 ) for the Response surface methodology (RSM) 3 replicates were set at the center of the design for the estimation of the pure error sum of squares (Ferreira et al 2007;Lim et al 2019).…”
Section: Film Weight and Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the lyophilised form, bacterial cellulose has an elongation at break of approximately 5% and a typical tensile strength of 340 mPa, a Young’s modulus of 12 GPa, and a maximum strain order of 4%. However, wet bacterial cellulose has a maximum strain order of 20%, tensile strength of 400 mPa, and Young’s modulus of 130–145 GPa, indicating that wet bacterial cellulose has a greater level of elasticity [ 40 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%