2016
DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2016.1143972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of word-initial fricatives of Mandarin Chinese in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants

Abstract: In general, these results indicate that the CI children have not established distinct categories for the Mandarin fricatives in terms of the place of articulation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For fricative productions, due to the presence of background noise at low-frequency regions that might interfere with acoustic analysis, all fricative samples were high-pass filtered at 1000 Hz using a sixth order Butterworth filter. Then, a set of seven acoustic measures (i.e., spectral peak, rise time, normalized amplitude, spectral mean, spectral variance, spectral skewness, and spectral kurtosis) were obtained using a custom MATLAB program (Lee et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2017). The rise time was defined as the time interval from the onset of frication to the maximum amplitude of frication noise (Dorman et al, 1980;Mahmoodzade and Bijankham, 2007).…”
Section: Acoustic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For fricative productions, due to the presence of background noise at low-frequency regions that might interfere with acoustic analysis, all fricative samples were high-pass filtered at 1000 Hz using a sixth order Butterworth filter. Then, a set of seven acoustic measures (i.e., spectral peak, rise time, normalized amplitude, spectral mean, spectral variance, spectral skewness, and spectral kurtosis) were obtained using a custom MATLAB program (Lee et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2017). The rise time was defined as the time interval from the onset of frication to the maximum amplitude of frication noise (Dorman et al, 1980;Mahmoodzade and Bijankham, 2007).…”
Section: Acoustic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normalized amplitude was defined as the difference in dB between the root-meansquare (RMS) amplitude of the entire portion of frication and the RMS amplitude of the entire portion of the following vowel (Fox and Nissen, 2005;Jongman et al, 2000). The spectral peak, spectral mean, spectral variance, spectral skewness, and spectral kurtosis were all computed based on a 40-ms full Hamming window in the middle portion of frication (Jongman et al, 2000;Lee et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2017). Figure 2 shows the mean vowel formant trajectories of all speakers in both unprocessed and all six processed conditions.…”
Section: Acoustic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speech production ability and language development of CI users, especially of those children with prelingual deafness, have been the major focus of the postoperative rehabilitation process. Detailed acoustic analyses of the production of vowels and fricatives in CI children have shown significant progress in phoneme development, but there are still significant remaining deficits in speech production in those children ( Uchanski and Geers, 2003 ; Yang et al, 2015 , 2017a ; Yang and Xu, 2017 ). For CI children who speak tonal languages, such as Mandarin Chinese, speech production is compounded by the involvement of lexical tones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the absence of effective auditory feedback, prelingually deafened children would likely rely on visual or somatosensory inputs to establish a feedback connection with their vocal production ( Tobey et al, 1991 ; Osberger et al, 1993 ; Nava et al, 2014 ; Selleck and Sataloff, 2014 ). With their auditory function partially restored with CIs, prelingually deafened children still face challenges in their speech production ( Uchanski and Geers, 2003 ; Yang et al, 2015 , 2017a ; Yang and Xu, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%