1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02822763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of transgenic maize plants and progeny by bombardment of hi-II immature embryos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
1
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
38
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, using the transcription factors Bbm and Wus2, we demonstrated that cells in the exposed embryo axis of mature maize seed can reproducibly produce transgenic callus and regenerate healthy, fertile T0 plants. In contrast to scutellum transformation typically observed for immature embryo transformation (Songstad et al, 1996), we never observed transgenic events originating from the mature scutellum of maize embryos. The simplest explanation for this difference is that the Agrobacterium strain used in our experiments for mature embryo transformation predominantly delivered DNA into cells of the embryo axis and not the scutellum ( Figure 5C).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, using the transcription factors Bbm and Wus2, we demonstrated that cells in the exposed embryo axis of mature maize seed can reproducibly produce transgenic callus and regenerate healthy, fertile T0 plants. In contrast to scutellum transformation typically observed for immature embryo transformation (Songstad et al, 1996), we never observed transgenic events originating from the mature scutellum of maize embryos. The simplest explanation for this difference is that the Agrobacterium strain used in our experiments for mature embryo transformation predominantly delivered DNA into cells of the embryo axis and not the scutellum ( Figure 5C).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…For monocots, there has been a progression from particle gun transformation to that mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, as well as refinements in tissue culture protocols and selection strategies (Shrawat and Lörz, 2006). Since the earliest reports of maize protoplast transformation (Rhodes et al, 1988;Shillito et al, 1989;Golovkin et al, 1993), the preferred target cells for transformation have gone from maize cells in liquid suspension (Fromm et al, 1990;Gordon-Kamm et al, 1990;Frame et al, 1994), through embryogenic callus (Walters et al, 1992;Wan et al, 1995), and finally to the transformation of scutellar cells of freshly isolated immature embryos (Ishida et al, 1996;Songstad et al, 1996;Frame et al, 2002). For other monocots such as barley (Hordeum vulgare), wheat, rice, and sorghum, immature embryos remain the predominant transformation target, despite reports over the years of successfully initiating tissue culture responses from explants other than immature embryos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agrobacterium-mediated transformation with pWY76 and pWY86 was performed as described (7). Biolistic-mediated gene transformation of maize immature embryos was conducted as described (42,43).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle-mediated transformation was performed as described by Songstad et al (1996). After incubating the embryos on 560P medium in the dark at 28°C for 4 or 5 d, they were transferred onto 560Y medium and subcultured scutellum side up for 3 h before transformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%