1993
DOI: 10.1002/bit.260410210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of the siderophore enterobactin: Use of four different fermentation systems and identification of the compound by HPLC

Abstract: The article describes four different fermentation procedures for Escherichia coli AN311, a producer of enterobactin. A regular rotary shaker culture with a biphasic system consisting of an agar layer (as a reservoir for feeding processes) and a layer of liquid medium, 2.4 L and 10 L batch cultures, and a novel dialysis membrane fermentor were used. With the use of this latter fermentor type, the production of enterobactin could be increased by a factor of about 9.5, while growth increased by a factor of 12 com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(4 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact that the cell numbers of E. coli CAT4 were 4-logs lower than those of MG1655 at this time, we found more 59 FeEnt in the former strain's gut mucus. This finding, that CAT4 hyperexcretes enterobactin in vivo, corroborated previous findings in vitro [31], [32], [60], [61]. Even though they were present at 10,000-fold lower abundance (a finding that was substantiated by statistical analysis of three colonization experiments), CAT4 cells secreted as much or more enterobactin as wild type bacteria.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the fact that the cell numbers of E. coli CAT4 were 4-logs lower than those of MG1655 at this time, we found more 59 FeEnt in the former strain's gut mucus. This finding, that CAT4 hyperexcretes enterobactin in vivo, corroborated previous findings in vitro [31], [32], [60], [61]. Even though they were present at 10,000-fold lower abundance (a finding that was substantiated by statistical analysis of three colonization experiments), CAT4 cells secreted as much or more enterobactin as wild type bacteria.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Each reported data point derived from the pooled gut lavage samples of 5 mice, and therefore represents an intrinsic average of five individuals, which provides a high degree of reliability. In light of these considerations, and the fact that the observed catecholate levels in vivo recapitulated extensive previously published data [31], [32], [60], [61], we did not see the need to statistically re-validate a well-known phenomenon by the involvement of 25 additional animals.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…E. coli and other enterobactin producing bacteria are commonly present in the gut microbiome, albeit at low concentrations . In fact, their levels can increase following V. cholerae infection. , In pure culture, strains of E. coli have produced greater than 200 μM enterobactin (which readily hydrolyzes into LinEnt) . Furthermore, enterobactin has been observed in animal guts .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trifluoroactic acid guarantees a continuous acidity (pH 3) over the whole gradient and it can easily be removed by evaporation or lyphilization. While in earlier studies additional bioassays were used for the identification of HPLC peaks (Seiffert et al 1993). the present investigation makes use of electrospray mass spectrometry which proved to be especially well suited for the analysis of DHBS compounds because the molecules are preferentially split at the ester bonds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, analytical HPLC is the method of choice tofollow enterobactin production. Enterobactin and derivatives from culture fluids have previously been identified spectroscopically (Scarrow et al 1991, Berner et al 1991 or by bioassays (Seiffert et al 1993). However, the relative quantities of hydrolysis products of enterobactin esterase (Brickrnan and McIntosh 1992) have never been determined in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%