Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2057012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of primary mirror segments for the Giant Magellan Telescope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This prototype is the first of the six, identical off-axis segments and one spare that will be produced. The fabrication process and final figure of GMT1 are discussed in detail in Martin et al 11 and Tuell et al 12 . Briefly, the GMT1 surface is accurate to 19 nm RMS after a simulated active-optics correction using 27 bending modes, with more bending modes providing even greater accuracy.…”
Section: Telescope Opticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prototype is the first of the six, identical off-axis segments and one spare that will be produced. The fabrication process and final figure of GMT1 are discussed in detail in Martin et al 11 and Tuell et al 12 . Briefly, the GMT1 surface is accurate to 19 nm RMS after a simulated active-optics correction using 27 bending modes, with more bending modes providing even greater accuracy.…”
Section: Telescope Opticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GMT Segment 1, the first off-axis segment, was completed in August 2012. [7], [8] The surface is accurate to 18 nm rms after a simulated active-optics correction using 27 bending modes with 21 N rms correction force. The off-axis geometry meets its tolerances, with the error in off-axis distance = 0.2 ± 1.2 mm and the clocking error = 0 ± 13 arcseconds.…”
Section: Status Of Segment Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final measurements of Segment 1 in 2012 showed agreement among the tests, within the expected uncertainties, for radius of curvature, off-axis distance, clocking, and low-order aberrations through spherical. [7] These are the parameters that are sensitive to alignment errors in the tests and, therefore, the parameters most vulnerable to a mistake in any one test. The agreement among the tests guarantees that the mirror surface can be corrected with active optics in the telescope to eliminate low-order errors and leave only mid-scale and small-scale errors of about 20 nm rms.…”
Section: Validatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we polished Segment 1 we found that our 1.2 m stressed lap polishing system was not as effective for the off-axis mirror as it had been for symmetric mirrors. [5] The removal rate varied across the surface, probably because of inconsistent fit between the lap and the aspheric surface. We implemented an orbital polisher with passive tools up to 35 cm diameter and gradually built up its capabilities during the polishing of Segment 1.…”
Section: Improved Orbital Polishingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5], [6] The surface is accurate to 18 nm rms after a simulated active-optics correction using 27 bending modes with 21 N rms correction force. The off-axis geometry meets its tolerances with the error in off-axis distance = +0.2 ± 1.2 mm and the clocking error = 0 ± 13 arcseconds.…”
Section: Status Of Segment Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%