2023
DOI: 10.3390/jof9090928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of Phenylacetylcarbinol via Biotransformation Using the Co-Culture of Candida tropicalis TISTR 5306 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae TISTR 5606 as the Biocatalyst

Anbarasu Kumar,
Charin Techapun,
Sumeth Sommanee
et al.

Abstract: Phenylacetylcarbinol (PAC) is a precursor for the synthesis of several pharmaceuticals, including ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and norephedrine. PAC is commonly produced through biotransformation using microbial pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) in the form of frozen–thawed whole cells. However, the lack of microorganisms capable of high PDC activity is the main factor in the production of PAC. In addition, researchers are also looking for ways to utilize agro-industrial residues as an inexpensive carbon source thro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though a two-phase emulsion system could improve PAC production due to its compatibility with the hydrophobic structure of organic phase ( Sandford et al, 2005 ), the associated cost per unit of PAC production could be higher if the produced PAC was not sufficiently high enough to offset the cost of employed organic phase. This was in agreement with the work of Kumar et al (2023) where the total production cost between a two-phase emulsion system with a volume ratio of 1:1 (vegetable oil:1 M Pi buffer) was increased by 135% in comparison with a single-phase emulsion system (USD 1.93/kg PAC compared with USD 0.82/kg PAC). This was nearly equivalent to 146% increase to the PAC being formed which might not be worthwhile to the investment cost.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Even though a two-phase emulsion system could improve PAC production due to its compatibility with the hydrophobic structure of organic phase ( Sandford et al, 2005 ), the associated cost per unit of PAC production could be higher if the produced PAC was not sufficiently high enough to offset the cost of employed organic phase. This was in agreement with the work of Kumar et al (2023) where the total production cost between a two-phase emulsion system with a volume ratio of 1:1 (vegetable oil:1 M Pi buffer) was increased by 135% in comparison with a single-phase emulsion system (USD 1.93/kg PAC compared with USD 0.82/kg PAC). This was nearly equivalent to 146% increase to the PAC being formed which might not be worthwhile to the investment cost.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In fact, the total cost of two-phase emulsion system with vegetable oil and 1 M Pi buffer in this study was much lower (USD 0.42/kg PAC) when the optimal volume ratio of 0.43:1 was employed ( Gunawan et al, 2008 ). The cost effectiveness of this system was significantly pronounced ( p ≤ 0.05) when compared to the work of Kumar et al (2023) with a cost mitigation of 78.4% and 49.1% for similar two-phase emulsion and single-phase emulsion systems. The potential of the multi-pass recycling system of vegetable oil as predicted by Kumar et al (2023) was quite attractive to further the lowering in production cost while facilitating PAC accumulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations