2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.04.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of monodisperse epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) microparticles by spray drying for high antioxidant activity retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the drying temperatures ranging between 70 °C and 130 °C showed a little effect on antioxidant activity of EGCG since NMR spectrum studies indicated that EGCG did not undergo chemical structural change during encapsulation process. These results confi rmed that low-temperature drying method is favorable for the maintenance of optimized chemopreventive activity of EGCG [ 120 ].…”
Section: Microparticlessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Using the drying temperatures ranging between 70 °C and 130 °C showed a little effect on antioxidant activity of EGCG since NMR spectrum studies indicated that EGCG did not undergo chemical structural change during encapsulation process. These results confi rmed that low-temperature drying method is favorable for the maintenance of optimized chemopreventive activity of EGCG [ 120 ].…”
Section: Microparticlessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Fu et al (2011) determined that the drying temperature (in the range of 70-130°C) of EGCG nanoparticles produced by spray drying has little effect on the particle morphology, indicating that the used lower temperature in the present study is justified. The extensively dented surface of oligofructose (Fig.…”
Section: Sem Microscopy and Ftirmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…1d) encapsulated microparticles has also been observed in previous studies, such as in gum arabic-maltodextrin microparticles encapsulating EGCG (Peres et al 2011), nopal mucilage (Opuntia ficus indica) microparticles encapsulating gallic acid (Medina-Torres et al 2013) and ß-carotene using modified tapioca starch and maltodextrin as encapsulating agents (Loksuwan 2007). In case of using inulin, starch or hydrocolloid gums (acacia, guar, LBG, xanthan), corrugated surface of the particles can be especially observed, which may be attributed to uneven drying and shrinkage, as previously observed by Fu et al (2011). According to the same authors, the shrinkage of particles occurs due to the slow diffusion rate of encapsulated compounds (in our case green tea polyphenols and caffeine) inside the particle.…”
Section: Sem Microscopy and Ftirmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The MFJSD equipped with MFAN has been shown to be very versatile in the generation of powders of up to 20 g/h (Fig. 5), with the applications to date including, but not limited to, functional foods (Fu et al, 2011;Fang, Rogers, Selomulya, & Chen, 2012), photoluminescent composites (Wu et al, 2011a), ultra high temperature ceramics (Zhong et al, 2012), magnetic materials Amelia, Wu, Chen, & Selomulya, 2012), microencapsulates (Liu, Selomulya, & Chen, 2013a;Liu et al, 2013b;Liu, Wu, Selomulya, & Chen, 2011a, 2011b, 2013cWu, Liu, Selomulya, & Chen, 2011c), and mesoporous microparticles (Waldron et al, 2014a,b;Wu et al, 2013). The next section will provide a brief overview of uniform microparticles generated via the microfluidic jet spray drying technique, and their potential applications for encapsulation and controlled release.…”
Section: Microfluidic Aerosol Nozzle (Mfan)mentioning
confidence: 99%