1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19970605)54:5<401::aid-bit1>3.0.co;2-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of monoclonal antibodies by tobacco hairy roots

Abstract: Hairy roots of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) were used to produce full‐length murine lgG1 monoclonal antibody. The presence of heavy (γ) and light (κ) chains and fully assembled antibody was verified by Western blot analysis of root extracts. Antibody levels in the biomass and medium were quantified by ELISA based on detection of γ‐κ complexes. Antibody produced by hairy roots was fully functional as demonstrated in bacterial aggregation assays which confirmed bivalent antigen‐binding capacity. Eight antibody‐pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the extracellular medium (intercellular fluid of leaves and culture medium of BY-2 cells), the yield was dramatically low. For instance, less than 200 lg/l antibody was found in the BY-2 culture medium while a yield of 1.99 mg/l was obtained for another antibody secreted from N. tabacum suspension cells derived from transgenic hairy roots (Sharp and Doran 1999;Wongsamuth and Doran 1997). A reason might be that different antibodies might behave differently regarding their transport out of the cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the extracellular medium (intercellular fluid of leaves and culture medium of BY-2 cells), the yield was dramatically low. For instance, less than 200 lg/l antibody was found in the BY-2 culture medium while a yield of 1.99 mg/l was obtained for another antibody secreted from N. tabacum suspension cells derived from transgenic hairy roots (Sharp and Doran 1999;Wongsamuth and Doran 1997). A reason might be that different antibodies might behave differently regarding their transport out of the cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few reports comparing antibody expression between transgenic leaves or hairy roots and cell suspensions derived from transgenic plants (De Neve et al 1993;Sharp and Doran 1999;Van Engelen et al 1994;Wongsamuth and Doran 1997). However, to our knowledge, there has been no report of a side-by-side comparison of the degradation, glycosylation and in situ localization of the same full size antibody expressed in both plant and suspension cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, different categories of recombinant proteins like antibodies, cytokines, vaccines, and enzymes are known to be expressed and produced by HRCs of various plants (Obembe et al 2011;Georgiev et al 2012). The first ever report of HRC-based pharmaceutical protein production was of fulllength murine IgG1 antibody from tobacco hairy roots (Wongsamuth and Doran 1997). In comparison to other (bio) production platforms, the HRCs provide (1) assurance of climate-and contamination-free production of pharmacologically active proteins and (2) easy acetylation, phosphorylation, glycosylation, and other post-translational modifications because of their eukaryotic molecular organization.…”
Section: Molecular Farmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research in this area has focused on the use of undifferentiated plant cultures such as cell suspensions rather than roots and shoots. Yet, hairy roots and shooty teratomas have been demonstrated to be effective host culture systems for recombinant protein synthesis (Wongsamuth and Doran, 1997;Sharp and Doran, 2001a,b;Jin et al, 2005), with potential advantages including greater long-term stability of transgene expression (Sharp and Doran, 2001b). Hairy roots are characterised by fast growth rates compared with whole plants and are more genetically stable than suspended cells (Aird et al, 1988;Flores, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%