2003
DOI: 10.1029/2002gl016592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of methyl bromide in a temperate forest soil

Abstract: [1] Field enclosure measurements of a temperate forest soil show net uptake of ambient methyl bromide (CH 3 Br), an important trace gas in both tropospheric and stratospheric ozone cycling. The net flux for 1999 was estimated to be À168 ± 72 mg CH 3 Br m À2 (negative indicates loss from the atmosphere). Individual enclosure flux measurements ranged from À4.0 to +3.3 mg CH 3 Br m À2 d À1 . Soil consumption of CH 3 Br was estimated from laboratory soil incubations. Production of CH 3 Br was calculated as the dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
17
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These measurements are broadly consistent with previous methyl bromide measurements from temperate forests and woodlands (Dimmer et al, 2001;Varner et al, 2003;Drewer et al, 2008;Rhew et al, 2010) and provide further comparative data for those few studies that examine methyl chloride and/or methyl iodide (Dimmer et al, 2001;Sive et al, 2007;Rhew et al, 2010) (Table 1). These measurements are broadly consistent with previous methyl bromide measurements from temperate forests and woodlands (Dimmer et al, 2001;Varner et al, 2003;Drewer et al, 2008;Rhew et al, 2010) and provide further comparative data for those few studies that examine methyl chloride and/or methyl iodide (Dimmer et al, 2001;Sive et al, 2007;Rhew et al, 2010) (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These measurements are broadly consistent with previous methyl bromide measurements from temperate forests and woodlands (Dimmer et al, 2001;Varner et al, 2003;Drewer et al, 2008;Rhew et al, 2010) and provide further comparative data for those few studies that examine methyl chloride and/or methyl iodide (Dimmer et al, 2001;Sive et al, 2007;Rhew et al, 2010) (Table 1). These measurements are broadly consistent with previous methyl bromide measurements from temperate forests and woodlands (Dimmer et al, 2001;Varner et al, 2003;Drewer et al, 2008;Rhew et al, 2010) and provide further comparative data for those few studies that examine methyl chloride and/or methyl iodide (Dimmer et al, 2001;Sive et al, 2007;Rhew et al, 2010) (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…High spatial variability in methyl halide emissions has been previously reported (Dimmer et al, 2001) although it has not always been apparent (Varner et al, 2003;Rhew et al, 2010). This study, in conjunction with previous reports (Dimmer et al, 2001;Drewer et al, 2008), provides further evidence that hot spots play a significant role in determining net forest soil fluxes of methyl chloride and methyl bromide.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the diversity of biogenic sources, the quantification of methyl halide contribution from these sources is challenging. Known terrestrial sources include coastal salt marshes [ Drewer et al ., ; Manley et al ., ; Rhew et al ., ], mangroves [ Manley et al ., ], freshwater wetlands [ Dimmer et al ., ; Varner et al ., ], woodland and forest soils [ Drewer et al ., ; Varner et al ., ], and fungi [ Mead et al ., ; Redeker et al ., ]. Specific plants are potentially large emitters of methyl halides, including agricultural crops such as rapeseed ( Brassica napus ), cabbage ( Brassica oleracea ), rice ( Oryza sativa ), and potato tubers ( Solanum tuberosum ) [ Gan et al ., ; Harper et al ., ; Redeker et al ., ; ; Khan et al ., ; Saini et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This imbalance reflects uncertainty in the magnitude of both natural sources and anthropogenic emissions. Terrestrial plant emissions probably represent the most uncertain term in the global budget, because relatively few plant species or biomes have been studied to date, and because of the challenges associated with differentiating between net and gross fluxes [ Rhew et al , 2003; Varner et al , 2003; Redeker et al , 2004; White et al , 2005].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%