2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of high-calorific biogas from food waste by integrating two approaches: Autogenerative high-pressure and hydrogen injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the methane content creased from 52.4% to 67% with an increase in excess pressure from 1 to 3 bar. The dif ence in AD performances can be explained by the extremely high OLR (5.49-16.38 VS/(m 3 ·day) in the current work compared to Kim et al [43].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the methane content creased from 52.4% to 67% with an increase in excess pressure from 1 to 3 bar. The dif ence in AD performances can be explained by the extremely high OLR (5.49-16.38 VS/(m 3 ·day) in the current work compared to Kim et al [43].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Table 3 summarizes the results of such studies. The most similar substrate (simulated food waste) was subjected to anaerobic digestion in 3-L digesters by Kim et al [43]. At OLR of 2.67 kg COD/(m 3 •day) and overpressure from 1 to 3 bars, the MPR and MY values were obtained in the range of 0.74-0.75 L/(L•day) and 280 mL/g COD, respectively; pH had near-neutral values (7.4-7.5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing methane content at high pressures, it could be found that they are resembling. In particular, Kim et al [ 52 ] reported that the increase of CH 4 content in the biogas at elevated pressure is usually investigated by using continuous reactors. CH 4 content values in the range 75–78%v/v were achieved at 9 bar in an anaerobic filter system fed with diluted maize silage and grass of 20–25 g COD/L [ 23 , 53 , 54 ]; moreover, it achieved 80%v/v and 90%v/v at 6 and 17 bar, respectively, from the food waste of having 100 g COD/L [ 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CH 4 content values in the range 75–78%v/v were achieved at 9 bar in an anaerobic filter system fed with diluted maize silage and grass of 20–25 g COD/L [ 23 , 53 , 54 ]; moreover, it achieved 80%v/v and 90%v/v at 6 and 17 bar, respectively, from the food waste of having 100 g COD/L [ 55 ]. However, Kim et al [ 52 ] pointed out that comparisons with former performance are not suitable in AHPD, since the CH 4 content could be varied depending on the substrate characteristics, in particular, substrate concentration. Therefore, variability of initial COD concentration represents a further parameter to investigate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since injected H 2 could use surplus CO 2 dissolved in the liquid phase of HPAD to mitigate the decreasing pH and further convert CO 2 into CH 4 internally. Kim et al (Kim et al, 2021) claimed that after the addition of H 2 into the HPAD reactor, the CH 4 content increased up to 92.1% compared to 77.4% of the control, and pH increased from 6.7 to 8.7 at 5 bar when treating food waste. Thus, these two technologies could make up for each other's shortcomings.…”
Section: H 2 Additionmentioning
confidence: 99%