Abstract. Mouse spermatozoa can be freeze dried without losing genetic integrity and reproductive potential. However, it is not known if freeze-dried mouse cells similarly maintain their genetic integrity and developmental potential following nuclear transfer. Here, we investigated the developmental capacity and embryonic stem (ES) cell derivation of reconstructed oocytes by nuclear transfer using freeze-dried cumulus or ES cells. Cumulus and ES cells were lyophilized overnight and stored at 4 C for up to 1 week. After rehydration, all cells showed membrane damage and were unviable. However, following nuclear transfer, 1-4% of the reconstructed oocytes developed to the blastocyst stage. A total of five nuclear transfer ES (ntES) cell lines were generated from blastocysts and morulae. All ntES cell lines had normal karyotypes and were positive for the ES-cell-specific markers (alkaline phosphatase, Oct3/4 and Nanog). After aggregation of ntES cells with fertilized embryos, chimeric mice with a high level of coat color chimerism were generated. Our findings show that the genomic integrity of cells can be maintained after freeze-drying and that it is possible to produce offspring from the cells using nuclear transfer techniques. Key words: Clone, Freeze-dry, Nuclear transfer, Nuclear transfer embryonic stem (ntES) cell, Mouse, Reprogramming (J. Reprod. Dev. 54: [486][487][488][489][490][491] 2008) reeze-dried sperm can support normal development into healthy mice if injected directly into mature oocytes even though the lyophilized spermatozoa are all dead in the conventional sense [1,2]. It has been shown that the complete sperm DNA can be maintained after freeze-drying in several species [3,4]. In mammals, spermatozoa are structurally compatible with lyophilisation since they are small cells with a low level of hydration and their transcriptionally inactive DNA are tightly packed with protamines [5]. In contrast to spermatozoa, it has been thought that somatic cells would be less tolerant to the freeze-drying process because they are larger, have a higher water content and their chromatin organization is unpacked, making them vulnerable to the freezedrying process. It is not known if freeze-dried cell nuclei can generate further generations following nuclear transfer.It has been shown that when frozen cells are thawed without cryoprotection, nuclear transfer ES (ntES) cell lines can be generated from the dead cell nuclei and live mice can be created via germline transmission of chimeric mice [6]. We have already succeeded in producing live cloned mice from mouse somatic cells frozen for 16 years [7], and this suggests that the viability of donor cells is not important for producing the next generation using nuclear transfer. Recently, Loi et al. reported that sheep blastocysts could be generated from freeze-dried somatic cells with a similar success rate as for fresh cells following storage at room temperature for 3 years [8]. This was the first attempt to use freeze-dried somatic cells for nuclear transfer, bu...