1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf00836699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of electron-positron pairs in a nuclear coulomb field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, based on the original proposal [1] the production reactions off nuclei provide a tool to measure these quantities. This has been followed in [16][17][18][19] where the π 0 → γγ and η → γγ decay widths were measured. Presently a new generation of experiments [20] allows to measure the π 0 → γγ decay width via the Primakoff effect on a few percent level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, based on the original proposal [1] the production reactions off nuclei provide a tool to measure these quantities. This has been followed in [16][17][18][19] where the π 0 → γγ and η → γγ decay widths were measured. Presently a new generation of experiments [20] allows to measure the π 0 → γγ decay width via the Primakoff effect on a few percent level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Particle Data Group (PDG) bases its π 0 lifetime average on five measurements. Three are Primakoff experiments (29,30,31), the fourth is a direct measurement of τ π 0 (32), and the fifth is ) θ π (degrees)…”
Section: Previous Measurements Of the Neutral Pion Lifetimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements and calculations for (π 0 → γ γ ). Previous Primakoff experiments (29,30,31,35) are labeled 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The CERN direct measurement ( 32) is labeled 5.…”
Section: Primakoff Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that time a new experimental prediction from CERN-NA030 [11] suggested a smaller value for the partial width 7.25 ± 0.23 eV (statistical and systematic errors combined in quadrature). Older experiments (Tomsk, Desy and Cornell [12]), seemed not to be so precise (7.23 ± 0.55, 11.7 ± 1.2, 7.92 ± 0.42 eV, respectively); they relied on the so-called Primakoff effect [13] that is based on…”
Section: π 0 → γγmentioning
confidence: 99%