Mass Production of Beneficial Organisms 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-391453-8.00002-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of Coleopteran Predators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most frequently, IGP is reported to be damaging or antagonistic [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] although it may sometimes have a neutral [23] or beneficial (synergistic) effect [24,25].The effect of cannibalism has received less modelling attention, which is curious since it is often associated with IGP. Moreover, it is an important impediment to efficiency in the mass production of biological control agents [26][27][28][29][30][31]. In addition, in augmentative biological control, releases can result in high densities of natural enemies at low pest levels, or before the pest appears on the crop [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most frequently, IGP is reported to be damaging or antagonistic [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] although it may sometimes have a neutral [23] or beneficial (synergistic) effect [24,25].The effect of cannibalism has received less modelling attention, which is curious since it is often associated with IGP. Moreover, it is an important impediment to efficiency in the mass production of biological control agents [26][27][28][29][30][31]. In addition, in augmentative biological control, releases can result in high densities of natural enemies at low pest levels, or before the pest appears on the crop [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to facilitating mass production of C. maculata is through the provision of inexpensive, nutritious artificial diets that promote development, growth and reproduction of C. maculata over consecutive generations. Artificial diets devoid of insect components, or meridic diets (Grenier and De Clercq, 2003), would greatly reduce costs associated with rearing C. maculata, in lieu of natural prey, because natural prey (such as most aphid species) often require live host plants as food (Hagen, 1987;Riddick and Chen, 2014). No such standalone, arthropod-free artificial diet is currently available for lady beetles, but research has been ongoing (Smirnoff, 1958;Atallah and Newsom, 1966;Silva et al, 2010;Sighinolfi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should make the mass rearing of C. montrouzieri less time-consuming, less labour-intensive and more cost-effective. A possible next step in rationalizing the rearing system for this ladybird is the development of an artificial diet (Riddick and Chen 2013). Chumakova (1962) described an artificial diet based on casein and amino acids for C. montrouzieri but larvae suffered from high mortality (Hodek 1967).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only is this natural rearing method time-consuming but the seasonal availability of these plant materials also complicates the continuous supply of adequate quantities of mealybugs. In order to improve the economy of mass production, factitious food sources have been employed for the rearing of different coleopteran predators with notable success (Hodek and Honȇk 2009;Riddick and Chen 2013). For example, eggs of different Lepidoptera species have shown to be a suitable factitious food for the predatory ladybirds Adalia bipunctata (L.) (De Clercq et al 2005), Propylea japonica (Thunberg) (Hamasaki and Matsui 2006) and Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Berkvens et al 2008b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%