1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02040553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production method of no-carrier-added186Re

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 together with the available experimental values and theoretical data taken from ALICE-IPPE code [17]. We found a very good agreement with the data reported by Lapi et al [14], Tarkanyi et al [16], Szelecsenyi et al [18], and Shigeta et al [8] in the investigated energy region. The data reported by Zhang et al…”
Section: Cross-sections Of Residual Radioisotopes Of Rheniumsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 together with the available experimental values and theoretical data taken from ALICE-IPPE code [17]. We found a very good agreement with the data reported by Lapi et al [14], Tarkanyi et al [16], Szelecsenyi et al [18], and Shigeta et al [8] in the investigated energy region. The data reported by Zhang et al…”
Section: Cross-sections Of Residual Radioisotopes Of Rheniumsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Several investigations [7][8][9] were carried out for the production of high specific activity 186 Re radionuclide in no carrier added (NCA) form by proton bombardment on enriched tungsten targets using cyclotron, but large discrepancies are found among them. On a practical level, it is very difficult to estimate the causes of discrepancies among the data sets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their experiment the energy was degraded down to below 20 MeV to irradiate nat WO 3 targets to produce 186g Re via the 186 W(p,n) nuclear reaction (Shigeta et al, 1996) The discrepancy between the proton energy calculated based on Anderson and Ziegler approach (Andersen and Ziegler, 1977) (26.3 MeV) and the practical proton energy estimated from radioisotope yield ratios (15.6 MeV) was 10.6 MeV (Fassbender et al, 2013). In this work we observe the difference of ~12 MeV between TRIM predicted E in and optimum energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…64 Cu, 86 Y, 89 Zr and 124 I, will certainly increase. The same may be true for other potentially useful positron emitters, such as 55 Co, 71 As, 72 As and 73 Se. If the demands for those radionuclides increase further, it may become incumbent to intensively search for intermediate energy production routes leading to higher yields and purity.…”
Section: Research Orientationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…71]. Only in three works [72][73][74] small scale production has also been reported. A recent critical analysis [71] showed that, for obtaining a high-purity product, an enriched 186 W target is absolutely necessary and the maximum proton energy used should not exceed 18 MeV.…”
Section: Novel Low-energy β − Emittersmentioning
confidence: 99%