2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.09.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production lot sizing with quality screening and rework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal production quantity in Equation (12) is the same equation as that obtained in Moussawi-Haidar et al (2016).…”
Section: Derivation Of the Optimal Production Quantity (Y) When Defecmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The optimal production quantity in Equation (12) is the same equation as that obtained in Moussawi-Haidar et al (2016).…”
Section: Derivation Of the Optimal Production Quantity (Y) When Defecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory can be validated using the numerical parameters adopted from Moussawi-Haidar et al (2016). Take a constant demand rate of = 1200 units/year, and a production rate of = 1600 units/ year.…”
Section: Example 1 (Model 1: Defective Items Are Sold As a Single Batch)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Aging effect is a new assumption in their paper that makes decision maker determine the number and size of batches. MoussawiHaidar et al [14] considered an imperfect manufacturing process with two different scenarios for dealing with the defective items produced: selling them at a discount rate, or reworking them. An expected profit function with some closed-form expressions for the optimal production lot size have been derived for their proposed problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%