1966
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1966.tb01981.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production Function Analyses of Irish Farm Accounts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Crotty, the bounty allowed for increased income from milk and as a consequence the de-stocking of milch COWS. 112 In practice, the scheme allowed creameries to increase milk prices from revenue earned from the bounty.ll3 Output was also increased by the expansion of creameries into new areas. However, output began to decline from 1936, as farmers commenced the de-stocking of milch COWS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Crotty, the bounty allowed for increased income from milk and as a consequence the de-stocking of milch COWS. 112 In practice, the scheme allowed creameries to increase milk prices from revenue earned from the bounty.ll3 Output was also increased by the expansion of creameries into new areas. However, output began to decline from 1936, as farmers commenced the de-stocking of milch COWS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%