Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, cases where the production of a form is more advanced that its comprehension are not uncommon (see Hendriks, 2013;Hendriks & Koster, 2010 for an overview). For instance, English-speaking children produce the thirdperson singular /s/ on novel verbs by age 2 or 3 (Theakston, Lieven, & Tomasello, 2003), but can reliably use it as a cue to subject number only after age 5 (Johnson, de Villiers, & Seymour, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, cases where the production of a form is more advanced that its comprehension are not uncommon (see Hendriks, 2013;Hendriks & Koster, 2010 for an overview). For instance, English-speaking children produce the thirdperson singular /s/ on novel verbs by age 2 or 3 (Theakston, Lieven, & Tomasello, 2003), but can reliably use it as a cue to subject number only after age 5 (Johnson, de Villiers, & Seymour, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other instantiations of psycholinguistic explanations, the produc tion-comprehension gap in the third-person singular /s/ agreement and third-person pronouns such as him have been attributed to children's difficulty with the linguistic perspective-taking necessary to monitor the contribution of particular linguistic forms as opposed to other alternatives in comprehension (Hendriks, 2013;Smolensky, 1996;cf. Brandt-Kobele & Höhle, 2010;Hendriks & Koster, 2010;Hendriks & Spenader, 2005;Spenader, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the documented production/comprehension asymmetries in HLLs (Hendriks & Koster, 2010;Sherkina--Lieber, 2011) and their sometimes--limited metalinguistic knowledge, this proposal advocates for the use of tasks tapping into different skills (comprehension, production, and acceptability judgments) to gauge students' underlying linguistic abilities. During this evaluative stage-prior to the implementation of C--BI-HLLs would be asked to complete a written task based on their perceptions and previous knowledge.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the documented production/comprehension asymmetries in HLLs (Hendriks & Koster, 2010;Sherkina--Lieber, 2011) and their sometimes--limited metalinguistic knowledge, this proposal advocates for the use of tasks tapping into different skills (comprehension, production, and acceptability judgments) to gauge students' underlying linguistic abilities. During this evaluative stage-prior to the implementation of C--BI-HLLs would be asked to complete a written task based on their perceptions and previous knowledge.…”
Section: Components and Implementation Of The Instructional Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%