1992
DOI: 10.1080/01418619208205596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production bias due to clustering of point defects in irradiation-induced cascades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
80
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the energy minimization, the single SIA tends to aggregate with the surrounding SIAs to form an SIA cluster, as shown in Figures 3(a2)-3(d2). The result agrees with the previous MD simulations that were carried out on single crystal structures where SIAs tend to cluster under cascade damage conditions [44,45]. Compared to the vacancies, SIAs and their clusters have been seen to possess a much lower activation energy [46,47] and therefore have a higher glissile mobility [48][49][50].…”
Section: Simulation Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…During the energy minimization, the single SIA tends to aggregate with the surrounding SIAs to form an SIA cluster, as shown in Figures 3(a2)-3(d2). The result agrees with the previous MD simulations that were carried out on single crystal structures where SIAs tend to cluster under cascade damage conditions [44,45]. Compared to the vacancies, SIAs and their clusters have been seen to possess a much lower activation energy [46,47] and therefore have a higher glissile mobility [48][49][50].…”
Section: Simulation Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Under neutron irradiation, the damage rate is equal to ~0.7-1 x10 -7 dpa s -1 [28,30]. Electron irradiation may be performed at damage rates higher than neutron irradiations by a factor of ~10 5 [25], but the damage is in the form of isolated Frenkel pairs [52] which will not require significant thermal agitation to annihilate. Irradiation by heavy ions produces damage cascades smaller than that of neutron-induced cascades, and those of proton irradiations are smaller still [53].…”
Section: Spp Dissolution and Amorphisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Models of defect evolution were then modified to take into account the clustering of defects obtained in MD calculations. This is the case of the "production bias" model 4 that included defect clustering in order to explain swelling rates measured experimentally in pure metals at low dose. 5 More recently, a combination of MD and KMC has shown that differences in the concentration of defects measured experimentally using transmission-electron microscopy (TEM) in irradiated Fe and Cu can be attributed to differences in the cascade defect distribution: MD calculations show that defects in Cu, both self-interstitials and vacancies, are typically in the form of clusters, whereas in Fe, vacancies are mostly isolated and self-interstitials are in clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%