2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020jf005586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production and Transport of Supraglacial Debris: Insights From Cosmogenic 10Be and Numerical Modeling, Chhota Shigri Glacier, Indian Himalaya

Abstract: Many mountain glaciers carry some amount of rocky debris on them, which modifies surface ablation rates. The debris is typically derived from erosion of the surrounding topography and its supraglacial extent is predominantly controlled by the relative accumulation rates of debris versus snow. Because Global Warming results in shrinking glaciers as well as thawing permafrost worldwide, changes in both rates will most likely affect the evolution of supraglacial debris cover and thus the response of glaciers to c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(b) Swath 2 (S2). Rockwall slope erosion: this study, Scherler and Egholm (2020); catchment‐wide erosion: Dortch et al. (2011a), Dietsch et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(b) Swath 2 (S2). Rockwall slope erosion: this study, Scherler and Egholm (2020); catchment‐wide erosion: Dortch et al. (2011a), Dietsch et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…White circles: location of catchments of this study. Gray circles: location of published rockwall slope erosion rate studies: Baltoro glacier system (Seong et al, 2009), Chhota Shigri (Scherler & Egholm, 2020), Bhagirathi glacier system (Orr et al, 2019). Major faults from Hodges (2000) and Schlup et al (2003).…”
Section: Regional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although it is understood that lithology and weathering rates will affect debris supply (Matsuoka and Sakai, 1999;Nagai et al, 2013;Scherler, 2014), debris source and deposition areas, volumes, frequency and rates remain poorly constrained (Benn and Evans, 2010). Estimates of denudation rates from headwall retreat (Heimsath and McGlynn, 2008;Seong et al, 2009), given in units per century or per millennium are difficult to integrate with a glacier system model that requires representation of episodic, discrete debris supply events (Scherler and Egholm, 2020). Measurements of rock volumes from individual events (e.g.…”
Section: Debris Supplymentioning
confidence: 99%