2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production and separation of 186gRe from proton bombardment of 186WC

Abstract: A proof of concept study was undertaken where non-carrier added (186 g)Re was produced from the cyclotron bombardment of (186)WC. (186)WC was carbo-thermally generated from a novel precursor synthesized from (186)WO3, aqueous ammonia and hexamethyltetramine. The inherent high electrical and thermal conductivity of this material, coupled with its high melting point, made it an ideal candidate for proton bombardment for production of (186)Re. An18 μA irradiation for 3h and processing via thermo-chromatography, (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sintering of W metal targets is also not possible at our facility, as the available furnaces do not begin to approach its melting point of 3422°C. Recently, Lapi et al have described production and irradiation of enriched tungsten carbide ( 186 WC) targets for production of high specific activity 186 Re (Richards et al, 2015). While this approach is attractive for target fabrication, the effort that is required to conduct the multiple steps and the time involved in the isolation process does not appear to have any advantages to the use of graphite-encased 186 W metal targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sintering of W metal targets is also not possible at our facility, as the available furnaces do not begin to approach its melting point of 3422°C. Recently, Lapi et al have described production and irradiation of enriched tungsten carbide ( 186 WC) targets for production of high specific activity 186 Re (Richards et al, 2015). While this approach is attractive for target fabrication, the effort that is required to conduct the multiple steps and the time involved in the isolation process does not appear to have any advantages to the use of graphite-encased 186 W metal targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall goal of this investigation was to demonstrate that production-levels of high specific activity 186 Re can be obtained via the (d,2n) reaction using thick W targets. Prior reported studies have used a variety of target materials for production of 186 Re, including W metal (Bonardi et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2001;Zhang et al, 1999), WO 3 (Fassbender et al, 2013;Moustapha et al, 2006;Shigeta et al, 1996), Al 2 (WO 4 ) 3 (Zhu et al, 1997), and W carbides (Richards et al, 2015). However, those studies were limited to "thin" target bombardments or thick target investigations using only natural abundance target 3 material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…186 Re can be produced in many nuclear reactors throughout the world, depending upon the specific activity requirements. 70 No-carrier-added 186 Re can also be produced by proton or deuteron bombardment of 186 W using a cyclotron [71][72][73] ; however, its availability via this route is still limited because of the lower yields of these reactions. Re with sufficient specific activity in many reactors, although this route has not been widely pursued for 188 Re availability.…”
Section: Gamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical review of the two reactions was performed [17], and an upper proton energy limit for the (p,n) reaction of 18 MeV was identified. Radiorhenium formed in matrices of either W metal or WO 3 may be chemically separated via dry distillation [18][19][20], liquid-liquid extraction [21] or anion-exchange controlled liquid-solid sorption [22][23][24] from aqueous target solutions prepared from either the metal (requiring oxidizer and base) or the trioxide (requiring base only).…”
Section: [Figure 1]mentioning
confidence: 99%