1988
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3770(88)90011-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production and nutrient dynamics in Carex wetlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aboveground biomass values for the wet and moist meadows ( Table 2) are similar to values reported for other meadows (Manning et al 1989;Bernard 1990;Jakrlová 1993) and within the range (500-1,050 g/m 2 ) presented in a review of biomass distribution in temperate sedge-dominated wetlands (Bernard et al1988). Although our values for belowground biomass (Table 2) greatly exceeded the range (150-900 g/m 2 ) given by Bernard et al (1988), they are comparable to those presented for other riparian meadows dominated by similar graminoid species (Manning et al 1989;Fiala 1993;Otting 1998;Toledo and Kauffman 2001). Discrepancies among biomass values presented here and data reported in the literature may be largely due to ecological differences in study sites (e.g., differences in light and nutrient limitation), but they may also be influenced by differences in sampling and processing methods, annual variation (Jakrlová 1993;Thormann and Bailey 1997), seasonal variation (Aerts et al 1992), and presentation of results as air-dry mass, dry mass, and AFDM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Aboveground biomass values for the wet and moist meadows ( Table 2) are similar to values reported for other meadows (Manning et al 1989;Bernard 1990;Jakrlová 1993) and within the range (500-1,050 g/m 2 ) presented in a review of biomass distribution in temperate sedge-dominated wetlands (Bernard et al1988). Although our values for belowground biomass (Table 2) greatly exceeded the range (150-900 g/m 2 ) given by Bernard et al (1988), they are comparable to those presented for other riparian meadows dominated by similar graminoid species (Manning et al 1989;Fiala 1993;Otting 1998;Toledo and Kauffman 2001). Discrepancies among biomass values presented here and data reported in the literature may be largely due to ecological differences in study sites (e.g., differences in light and nutrient limitation), but they may also be influenced by differences in sampling and processing methods, annual variation (Jakrlová 1993;Thormann and Bailey 1997), seasonal variation (Aerts et al 1992), and presentation of results as air-dry mass, dry mass, and AFDM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…) was higher than that observed in the present study (decreasing from 1 .1 up to 0 .6%) while phosphorus was similar (decreasing from 0 .15 up to 0.04%) . The inverse relationship between the nitrogen and phosphorus content of plants and their biomass have been reported before (Buresh et al ., 1980 ;Bernard et al ., 1988) and was explained as the result of dilution of nutrients because of faster carbon assimilation during the growing season . Coincidence between the maxima of nutrient standing stock and maxima of biomass is also well known (Buresh et al ., 1980 ;Bernard et al ., 1988) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous seasonal development for each vascular plant group was obtained by fitting a log-linear function between the leaf area and day number. A four-parameter model form, which includes a constant, was used for the plant groups that have some overwintering parts (Karlsson 1985;Bernard et al 1988). For the rest of the plant groups, which senesce in winter (forbs and deciduous shrubs), we used a threeparameter form that estimates leaf area to be zero at the beginning of the year.…”
Section: Vegetation Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%