2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9474(01)01514-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production and decay of higher baryon–hole excitations in nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a non-uniform occupation of magnetic sublevels, causes the anisotropic emission of a photon relative to the direction of an incident ion beam [3]. The values of calculated DR cross section for various directions can change up to several tens of percent when the anisotropy of DR radiation is taken into account [4]. Density matrix formalism [5] is the usual method for the derivation of the expressions for the differential cross sections of DR of polarized ions with polarized electrons [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…a non-uniform occupation of magnetic sublevels, causes the anisotropic emission of a photon relative to the direction of an incident ion beam [3]. The values of calculated DR cross section for various directions can change up to several tens of percent when the anisotropy of DR radiation is taken into account [4]. Density matrix formalism [5] is the usual method for the derivation of the expressions for the differential cross sections of DR of polarized ions with polarized electrons [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of calculated DR cross section for various directions can change up to several tens of percent when the anisotropy of DR radiation is taken into account [4]. Density matrix formalism [5] is the usual method for the derivation of the expressions for the differential cross sections of DR of polarized ions with polarized electrons [4,5]. Recently in the case of fully relativistic treatment, the expression for the differential cross section of DR was derived [3] by using a projection operator formalism [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%