Abstract:New exporters add and drop products with much greater frequency than old exporters. This paper rationalizes this behavior with a model of demand learning. In the model, an exporter's profitability on the demand side is determined by a timeinvariant firm-destination appeal index, and transient firm-destination-year preference shocks. New exporters must learn about their appeal index in the presence of these shocks, and respond to fluctuations in demand by adding and dropping products more frequently than older … Show more
“…They emphasize the facts of Eaton, Eslava, Jinkins, Krizan, and Tybout (2012) for Colombia and Eaton, Kortum, and Kramarz (2011) for France -many new exporters ship very small quantities and surviving exporters expand rapidly. Timoshenko (2013) focuses on a different dimension of exporter behavior, the margin of product switching. A model of learning by exporters in new markets is motivated by the fact that Brazilian exporters in their second year in the market have disproportionately greater shares of sales from new products and greater shares of new products in their product mix.…”
Section: The Characteristics and Performance Of New Exportersmentioning
Two otherwise identical firms that enter the same market in different months, one in January and one in December, will report dramatically different annual sales for the first calendar year of operations. This partial year effect in annual data leads to downward biased observations of the level of activity upon entry and upward biased growth rates between the year of entry and the following year. This paper examines the implications of partial year effects using Peruvian export data. The partial year bias is very large: the average level of first-year exports of new exporters is understated by 65 percent and the average growth rate between the first and second year of exporting is overstated by 112 percentage points. This paper re-examines a number of stylized facts about firm size and growth that have motivated rapidly expanding theoretical and empirical literatures on firm export dynamics. Correcting the partial year effect eliminates unusually high growth rates in the first year of exporting, raises initial export levels, and shifts 10 percent of market entrants from below to above the median size. Revisiting an older set of facts on firm size and growth, the paper finds that correcting for partial year biases reduces the number of small firms in the firm size distribution and weakens the negative relationship between firm growth and firm size.
“…They emphasize the facts of Eaton, Eslava, Jinkins, Krizan, and Tybout (2012) for Colombia and Eaton, Kortum, and Kramarz (2011) for France -many new exporters ship very small quantities and surviving exporters expand rapidly. Timoshenko (2013) focuses on a different dimension of exporter behavior, the margin of product switching. A model of learning by exporters in new markets is motivated by the fact that Brazilian exporters in their second year in the market have disproportionately greater shares of sales from new products and greater shares of new products in their product mix.…”
Section: The Characteristics and Performance Of New Exportersmentioning
Two otherwise identical firms that enter the same market in different months, one in January and one in December, will report dramatically different annual sales for the first calendar year of operations. This partial year effect in annual data leads to downward biased observations of the level of activity upon entry and upward biased growth rates between the year of entry and the following year. This paper examines the implications of partial year effects using Peruvian export data. The partial year bias is very large: the average level of first-year exports of new exporters is understated by 65 percent and the average growth rate between the first and second year of exporting is overstated by 112 percentage points. This paper re-examines a number of stylized facts about firm size and growth that have motivated rapidly expanding theoretical and empirical literatures on firm export dynamics. Correcting the partial year effect eliminates unusually high growth rates in the first year of exporting, raises initial export levels, and shifts 10 percent of market entrants from below to above the median size. Revisiting an older set of facts on firm size and growth, the paper finds that correcting for partial year biases reduces the number of small firms in the firm size distribution and weakens the negative relationship between firm growth and firm size.
“…This would translate into a lower size threshold above which firms can export and, accordingly, in lower initial firm export levels. 24 This is confirmed by estimation results reported in Figure 4.12, which indicate that initial pure Exporta Fácil exporters actually enter smaller than their regular peers (and also relative to firms that combine regular and Exporta Fácil sales), both at the firm-level and at the firm-product-destination level and even within narrowly defined 21 See Artopolous, Friel, and Hallak (2013), Johanson andVahlne (1997), andTimoshenko (2015). 22 Albornoz, Calvo Pardo, Corcos, and Ornelas (2012) show how experimentation and thereby learning can lead to sequentiality in firms' exports.…”
Section: Fact 1: Exporta Fácil Exporters Start Smaller Than Their Regmentioning
“…New-to-export firms must generally acquire export-specific knowledge and particularly learn the appeal of their products in specific destination (see Johanson and Vahlne, 1997;Artopolous et al, 2013;and Timoshenko, 2015a). By reducing the entry barriers to these markets and thereby making it easier to develop export capabilities and add and drop products, Exporta Fácil can facilitate experimentation and such export learning.…”
Section: How Can Exporta Fácil Affect Firms' Exports?mentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.