2017
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1403694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product review on the Anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab

Abstract: Immunotherapy as a therapeutic strategy has seized the narrative throughout clinical oncology over the past few years. Once considered a niche treatment for rare cancers, immunotherapy has quickly emerged as the standard of care for many common cancer types. The remarkable rise is largely due to the development of novel checkpoint inhibitors, specifically, antibodies targeting PD-1 and PD-L1. Offering promising efficacy with a favorable toxicity profile, these agents have been approved for use in several malig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the objective response rate was 48%; however, it was higher in patients with PDL-1 expression (IC 2/3). Similarly, OS was 11.4 months versus 6.5 months when comparing PDL-1 expression (IC 2/3 vs. IC 0), with the benefit favoring the use of atezolizumab 35 .…”
Section: Atezolizumabmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, the objective response rate was 48%; however, it was higher in patients with PDL-1 expression (IC 2/3). Similarly, OS was 11.4 months versus 6.5 months when comparing PDL-1 expression (IC 2/3 vs. IC 0), with the benefit favoring the use of atezolizumab 35 .…”
Section: Atezolizumabmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There are numerous Phase I/II trials, in which the usefulness of this molecule has been assessed in several neoplasms such as NSCSC, including BIRCH, FIR, POPLAR, and OAK, the latter being a Phase III, and IMVIGOR 210 a Phase II study on bladder cancer. In all these studies, atezolizumab was administered at a fixed dose of 1200 mg IV every 21 days 35 . Thus, the OAK study 36 , in a Phase III clinical trial randomized 850 patients diagnosed with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with progression to 1 or 2 previous lines of treatment and who met eligibility criteria, received atezolizumab 1200 mg versus docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks.…”
Section: Atezolizumabmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The threshold selection seems to be tumor-type dependent, i.e., high (>50%) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCL) and low (>1%) for the other types. For Atezolizumab, during clinical trials different positivity thresholds of PD-L1 expression were tested too, ranging from >1% to >50% [ 29 ]. For Durvalumab, a clinical trial NCT01693562 in NSCLC suggests that patient who had detectable levels of PD-L1 expression over 25% on tumor cells may have longer survival [ 30 ].…”
Section: Pd1 and Pd-l1: Wish You Were Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As PD-L1 knockdown does not represent a current clinical scenario in patients, we next evaluated a clinical grade PD-L1 blocking antibody, atezolizumab 61 . Again, naïve and activated T cells were cultured with control or chemerin-treated DU145 cells.…”
Section: Chemerin Treatment Is As Effective As Atezolizumab At Augmenmentioning
confidence: 99%