2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68560-1_61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product Recognition in Store Shelves as a Sub-Graph Isomorphism Problem

Abstract: The arrangement of products in store shelves is carefully planned to maximize sales and keep customers happy. However, verifying compliance of real shelves to the ideal layout is a costly task routinely performed by the store personnel. In this paper, we propose a computer vision pipeline to recognize products on shelves and verify compliance to the planned layout. We deploy local invariant features together with a novel formulation of the product recognition problem as a sub-graph isomorphism between the item… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their experiments report performance far from conducive to real-world deployment. A number of more recent proposals are aimed at improving product recognition by leveraging on: a) stronger features followed by classification ( [3]), b) the statistical correlation between nearby products on shelves ( [1,2]) c) information on the expected product disposition ( [33]) or d) a hierarchical multi-stage recognition pipeline ( [4]). Yet, all these recent works focus on a relatively small-scale problem, i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, their experiments report performance far from conducive to real-world deployment. A number of more recent proposals are aimed at improving product recognition by leveraging on: a) stronger features followed by classification ( [3]), b) the statistical correlation between nearby products on shelves ( [1,2]) c) information on the expected product disposition ( [33]) or d) a hierarchical multi-stage recognition pipeline ( [4]). Yet, all these recent works focus on a relatively small-scale problem, i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already discussed, at test time we pursue recognition from a different set of images (query). To create this set, for Grocery Products we automatically cropped individual items from the available shelf images according to the annotation released in [33], thereby obtaining a total of 938 query images. As for Prod-uct8600, we cropped and annotated individual items from shelf videos that we acquired in a grocery store by a tablet camera, for a total number of 273 query images.…”
Section: Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their experiments report performance far from conducive to real-world deployment in terms of accuracy and speed. A number of more recent works tried to improve product recognition by leveraging on: a) stronger features followed by classification [4], b) the statistical correlation between nearby products on shelves [1,2] c) additional information on the expected product disposition [22] or d) a hierarchical multi-stage recognition pipeline [5]. Yet, all these recent papers focus on a relatively small-scale problem, i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, given the candidate regions extracted from the query image and their corresponding sets of K-NN, we consider the 1-NN of the region proposals extracted with a high confidence (> 0.1) by the Detector in order to find the main macro category of the image. Then, in case the (a)-Customer [6] (b)-Management [22] majority of detections votes for the same macro category, it is safe to assume that the pictured shelf contains almost exclusively items of that category thus filter the K-NN for all candidate regions accordingly. It is worth observing how this strategy implicitly leverages on those products easier to identify (i.e., the high-confidence detections) to increase the chance to correctly recognize the harder ones.…”
Section: Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation